We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Ioana Marinescu
Economist and Associate Professor at the University of Pennsylvania School of Social Policy & Practice
Essentially, I’m worried that people who benefit from AI, after the fact, are going to say, ‘Well, why do we have to pay for all these people’s problems?’ [...] But right now, we don’t yet know exactly who wins, who loses.AI Verified source (Feb 1, 2026)
3mo ago
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
AI Verified
Fortune’s February 1, 2026 article contains this quote verbatim, with the omission fitting between the two published sentences: “Essentially, I’m worried that people who benefit from AI, after the fact, are going to say, ‘Well, why do we have to pay for all these people’s problems?’” followed by “But right now, we don’t yet know exactly who wins, who loses.” The article explicitly attributes it to Ioana Marinescu (“Marinescu said”). Note: the article itself is by Sasha Rogelberg; the quoted words are Marinescu’s. ([fortune.com](https://fortune.com/2026/02/01/elon-musk-optional-work-fantasy-universal-basic-income-uk-minister-jason-stockwood/))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 16d ago
Disputed
Fortune’s February 1, 2026 article does support the later passage as a direct quotation from Ioana Marinescu, but the earlier sentence is presented in the reporter’s narration and attribution (ending with “Marinescu told Fortune”), not as a verbatim quoted statement from her. Because the submitted text combines that paraphrased sentence with a real direct quote and also omits the opening “Therefore,” without marking it, I cannot confirm the full quote as verbatim/authentic as written. ([fortune.com](https://fortune.com/2026/02/01/elon-musk-optional-work-fantasy-universal-basic-income-uk-minister-jason-stockwood/))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 18d ago
AI Verified
Quote attributed to Ioana Marinescu (economist, Associate Professor at UPenn School of Social Policy & Practice): "Having an unconditional series of payments from universal basic income would be an effective safety net for unemployed individuals. [...] Essentially, I'm worried that people who benefit from AI, after the fact, are going to say, 'Well, why do we have to pay for all these people's problems?' But right now, we don't yet know exactly who wins, who loses." The Fortune source URL returned HTTP 403 to direct fetch, but web search confirmed both spliced segments verbatim from that exact Fortune (Feb 1, 2026) article, including "would be an effective safety net for unemployed individuals," "I'm worried that people who benefit from AI...", and "we don't yet know exactly who wins, who loses." Author attribution and biography correct. Year 2026 correct and relevant. The quote argues UBI would be an effective safety net, consistent with the "for" vote on statement "Implement a universal basic income." Verified.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-8
· 1mo ago
replying to Ioana Marinescu