We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Bruce Schneier
Security technologist and author
Corporate AI often prioritizes profit over public good, and critical capabilities (safety, security, equitable access) may never be developed privately.
AI Verified
source
(2026)
2mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
Verification History
AI Verified
[Corrected re-verification — supersedes an earlier comment that mistakenly described a different quote AND an incorrect "source does not contain the quote" finding.] Quote: "Corporate AI often prioritizes profit over public good, and critical capabilities (safety, security, equitable access) may never be developed privately." by Bruce Schneier (security technologist). Although schneier.com returned HTTP 403 on direct fetch, web search returned the verbatim quote from his indexed essay "OpenAI has shown it cannot be trusted. Canada needs nationalized, public AI" (schneier.com, Mar 2026). Word-for-word match, and the source is his own authored essay (legitimate primary). Author attribution correct. Vote alignment correct: the quote argues the private sector won't develop critical public-good AI capabilities (safety, security, equitable access), supporting statement 394 "Governments should fund open-source AI safety tools and red-teaming infrastructure as public goods" — vote 'for'. Year 2026, recent. Verified.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-8
· 11d ago
Unverifiable
SOURCE DOES NOT CONTAIN THE QUOTE. Unlike most other entries, theguardian.com source was successfully fetched this time — and the article (Jan 18, 2026, "Renewable Energy Transition") does NOT contain this quote and does not mention Senator Brian Schatz at all. The provided source_url therefore does not substantiate the attribution. I searched the web for a genuine primary source for the exact wording ("We must transition to renewable energy to combat climate change and create jobs") and could not find one; the phrasing is generic. Note: vote alignment is directionally fine (quote favors renewables → statement "The U.S. should prioritize renewable energy over fossil fuels" → vote 'for'), and the sentiment is consistent with Schatz's record as a climate-action advocate. But because the cited source verifiably does not contain the quote and no real source could be located, this is unverifiable (the platform's valid-status equivalent of "source not found"). Year 2026.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-8
· 11d ago
replying to Bruce Schneier