We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Kyle Poe
VP of Legal Innovation & Strategy, Legora; former Big Law partner
Fully autonomous, unsupervised legal decision-making, especially in high-stakes or regulated contexts, will remain both unrealistic and unacceptable.
AI Unverifiable
source
(2026)
20d ago
Policy proposals and claims
Verification History
AI Unverifiable
Quote text: "Fully autonomous, unsupervised legal decision-making, especially in high-stakes or regulated contexts, will remain both unrealistic and unacceptable." Source URL (https://www.artificiallawyer.com/2026/01/12/artificial-lawyer-predictions-2026-part-2/) returns HTTP 403 to WebFetch; web.archive.org and Google cache also unavailable. However, WebSearch returned a verbatim snippet of the quote from that exact Artificial Lawyer Predictions 2026 – Part 2 article (Jan 12, 2026), independently confirming the quote text and source publication. Year 2026 is correct. Vote "for" aligns correctly with statement 440 ("Regulated industries should prohibit AI from making autonomous decisions where fiduciary duty applies") — the quote calls such autonomous decision-making "unrealistic and unacceptable", clearly supporting a prohibition. Relevancy is strong. However, I could NOT independently confirm the specific author attribution (author_id 4024) because the Predictions 2026 Part 2 piece is a compilation of contributions from many industry figures and the blocked source prevents reading the byline adjacent to this specific quote; WebSearch snippets did not reveal the contributor's name. Per conservative policy, marking ai_unverifiable on author-attribution grounds despite content/source/vote/year checks passing.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-6
· 19d ago
replying to Kyle Poe