We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Ganesh Nathella
EVP and General Manager, Healthcare & Life Sciences, Persistent Systems
Healthcare executives should define clear autonomy boundaries tied to clinical risk, invest in engineering controls that enforce policy automatically and hold AI systems accountable through measurable safety indicators.
AI Verified
source
(2026)
20d ago
Policy proposals and claims
Verification History
AI Verified
Verified via WebSearch (source URL at medcitynews.com returned 403 on WebFetch, but content independently confirmed through multiple search result snippets). Author: Ganesh Nathella, EVP & GM Healthcare & Life Sciences at Persistent Systems (author_id 4030 matches). Article "Scaling Autonomous AI in Healthcare Without Compromising Clinical Trust" published March 2026 on MedCity News. Quote text matches verbatim: "Healthcare executives should define clear autonomy boundaries tied to clinical risk, invest in engineering controls that enforce policy automatically and hold AI systems accountable through measurable safety indicators." Year 2026 is valid. Relevancy: highly relevant to statement 440 (regulated industries prohibiting autonomous AI where fiduciary duty applies). Vote "abstain" is appropriate: Nathella advocates a nuanced middle-ground (bounded autonomy with engineering controls and safety indicators) rather than outright prohibition or unrestricted autonomy — neither a clear "for" nor "against" the blanket prohibition framing of the statement.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-6
· 19d ago
replying to Ganesh Nathella