We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Amy D. Roy
Partner, Ropes & Gray LLP (Investment Management Practice)
While this black-box condition may be an uncomfortable spot for an engineer, it is a legally precarious position for a fiduciary.
AI Unverifiable
source
(2025)
2mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
Verification History
AI Unverifiable
CORRECTION of a prior erroneous verification on this ID (an earlier note about Dario Amodei was mistakenly attached here; this re-verification reflects the actual content). Actual quote: "While this black-box condition may be an uncomfortable spot for an engineer, it is a legally precarious position for a fiduciary." Attributed to Amy D. Roy (Partner, Ropes & Gray LLP, Investment Management), 2025, sourced to Ropes & Gray alert "Meeting the AI Moment in Asset Management: An Agenda for Industry Lawyers" (Sept 2025). Checks: (1) Year 2025 — current. (2) Attribution/source: confirmed genuine — Amy D. Roy is a Ropes & Gray partner and the cited alert exists at the exact URL; web search confirms the article's central black-box/fiduciary theme matches the quote. (3) Relevancy: directly on-point for "Regulated industries should prohibit AI from making autonomous decisions where fiduciary duty applies" — the opacity of AI is framed as legally precarious for a fiduciary. (4) Vote alignment: the vote "for" correctly matches. Gap: Ropes & Gray blocks WebFetch and no snippet reproduced the exact verbatim sentence, so I could not positively confirm precise wording against the source. Marking ai_unverifiable on that basis; all other checks are positive.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-8
· 12d ago
AI Unverifiable
Quote attributed to Dario Amodei (CEO, Anthropic), 2025, sourced to Business Insider (Oct 2025). Checks: (1) Year 2025 — current. (2) Attribution: well-documented — multiple outlets (Business Insider, the-decoder, Axios, Fortune) confirm Amodei warned in Oct 2025 that AI could drive wealth concentration that could "break society." The first clause is solidly corroborated. (3) Vote alignment: the vote "for" on "Governments should tax capital, not labor, as AI makes human work less central to the economy" is defensible as a directional match (his warning motivates redistribution/taxing AI gains), though the quote itself is a warning about inequality and does not explicitly state a position on taxing capital vs. labor — a mild relevancy caveat. (4) Source content: Business Insider blocks WebFetch (403) and its mirrors are paywalled/JS-gated; I could not retrieve a snippet reproducing the full verbatim quote — in particular the tail "...and lead to revolution" could not be confirmed (sources reliably confirm "break society" but not the "revolution" wording). Marking ai_unverifiable: source inaccessible and exact full wording (the "revolution" clause) not positively confirmed; recommend a maintainer verify/trim the quote against the BI article and confirm it squarely addresses the tax-capital statement.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-8
· 12d ago
replying to Amy D. Roy