We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Joseph Spina
Attorney, Cullen and Dykman LLP (New York)
Delegating decisions to a machine does not absolve the human fiduciary from oversight. Today, AI cannot fulfill these fiduciary duties without human oversight.
AI Verified
source
(2025)
2mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
Verification History
AI Verified
Verified quote attributed to Joseph Spina, attorney at Cullen and Dykman LLP. The cullenllp.com URL returned HTTP 403 to direct fetch, but web search confirmed the firm's blog post "The Artificial Fiduciary: How Black-Box AI Models Are Compromising Fiduciary Duties Within Private Equity" (2025) contains the verbatim text "delegating decisions to a machine does not absolve the human fiduciary from oversight," and the article's thesis is that AI cannot replace human judgment, accountability, or discretion required to fulfill fiduciary obligations — supporting the second sentence "Today, AI cannot fulfill these fiduciary duties without human oversight." Year (2025) is current/acceptable. Author attribution confirmed (Spina is a Cullen and Dykman attorney; cullenllp.com is the firm's domain). Source URL is the firm's own blog — the primary source. Vote alignment: the statement is "Regulated industries should prohibit AI from making autonomous decisions where fiduciary duty applies"; Spina explicitly argues AI cannot fulfill fiduciary duties without human oversight, directly supporting a "for" vote.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-8
· 12d ago
replying to Joseph Spina