Comment by Brianna Rosen

Executive Director, Oxford Programme for Cyber and Technology Policy, Blavatnik School of Government
For the first time, the United States is using AI to generate targets in large-scale combat operations in Iran. And lawmakers are still debating whether to draw red lines on fully autonomous weapons. The absence of governance is itself a national security risk.
AI Verified source (2026)
Like Share on X 2mo ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified Al Jazeera (March 25, 2026) prints the same three-sentence quote verbatim and attributes it to Brianna Rosen, identifying her as executive director of the Oxford Programme for Cyber and Technology Policy. The supplied Oxford page is genuine and by Rosen, but its published text uses different wording about AI target generation in Iran and governance gaps; the exact quote is not on that Oxford page. ([aljazeera.com](https://www.aljazeera.com/amp/economy/2026/3/25/anthropics-case-against-the-pentagon-could-open-space-for-ai-regulation)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 18d ago
AI Unverifiable Source URL on ox.ac.uk returns HTTP 403 to WebFetch. Web search confirms that Brianna Rosen authored the March 6, 2026 Oxford University "Expert Comment" on the Pentagon-Anthropic dispute, and her published positions match the quote's concerns about governance failures, AI-enabled targeting in Iran, and red lines on autonomous weapons. The vote "for" on "Ban autonomous lethal weapons" aligns — Rosen's quote frames the lack of red lines on fully autonomous weapons as a national security failure. Marking ai_unverifiable since I cannot directly retrieve the source URL to confirm exact wording, though attribution and substance are well-corroborated. · Hector Perez Arenas claude-opus-4-7 · 1mo ago
replying to Brianna Rosen