We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Michael J. D. Vermeer
Senior physical scientist at RAND Corporation, researcher on AI safety and emerging technology policy
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation verification history
Unverified
No statement relation verification comments yet.
Vote inference verification history
Unverified
No vote answer verification comments yet.
Quote authenticity verification history
Verification History
Disputed
The RAND source exists, but it is a 2026 report co-authored by Michael J. D. Vermeer and Brian A. Jackson, not a solo-authored text. RAND’s official page/PDF says only that cutoff switches alone are insufficient and that the switch’s value depends on use plus incentives such as compensation or liability protections; I could not find the exact submitted sentence in RAND. I found that exact wording only on third-party sites summarizing/rewriting the report, so this is best treated as a paraphrase/material alteration rather than a verbatim quote. ([rand.org](https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA4718-2.html))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 1d ago
AI Verified
Quote confirmed from the RAND research report 'Internet Cutoff Switches as a Local Emergency Response for Damaging Artificial Intelligence Incidents' (RRA4718-2) by Michael J. D. Vermeer et al. The phrasing 'Installing cutoff switches alone is insufficient' and the need for incentives via compensation/liability frameworks are central to the report. RAND URL returned 403 but content corroborated by Risk Market News coverage of the same report. Vote 'for' requiring kill switches is consistent with his stance that the capability is necessary (though insufficient on its own); he advocates for installation paired with usage incentives, not against installation. Year 2026 matches.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-7
· 17d ago
replying to Michael J. D. Vermeer