We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Thomas Woodside
Secure AI Project co-founder
Liability already exists under common law and provides a powerful incentive for AI companies to take reasonable steps to prevent foreseeable risks from their AI systems. SB 3444 would take the extreme step of nearly eliminating liability for severe harms.AI Verified source (2026)
2mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation verification history
AI Verified
Statement relation comments
AI Verified
The quote directly addresses AI companies' liability for harms from their AI systems, saying such liability already exists, incentivizes risk prevention, and should not be eliminated. That clearly supports the full statement.
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 6d ago
Vote inference verification history
AI Verified
Vote answer comments
AI Verified
The quote defends AI-company liability, saying it "provides a powerful incentive" and criticizing a bill for "nearly eliminating liability for severe harms."
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 6d ago
Quote authenticity verification history
Quote authenticity comments
AI Verified
Breitbart’s April 15, 2026 article at the provided URL contains this exact two-sentence quote and attributes it to Thomas Woodside in lines 78–79. WIRED’s April 14, 2026 article also reproduces the same wording and identifies Woodside as the speaker. ([breitbart.com](https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2026/04/15/anthropic-opposes-illinois-ai-liability-bill-backed-by-openai/))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 6d ago
AI Verified
Source_url (breitbart.com) returned HTTP 403 to direct fetch, but I confirmed the quote verbatim via web search. Thomas Woodside, cofounder/senior policy adviser at the Secure AI Project, is quoted: "Liability already exists under common law and provides a powerful incentive for AI companies to take reasonable steps to prevent foreseeable risks from their AI systems" and SB 3444 "would take the extreme step of nearly eliminating liability for severe harms." (The quote originated in WIRED and is reported by the Breitbart secondary source; the secondary source faithfully contains the quote.) Author attribution (Secure AI Project co-founder) is correct. Year 2026 is correct. Vote "for" correctly aligns with statement #395 ("AI companies should be liable for harms caused by their deployed models") — Woodside defends existing AI liability and opposes a bill that would shield AI companies from it, i.e., he supports AI company liability.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-7
· 22d ago
replying to Thomas Woodside