We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Pete Buttigieg
Former U.S. Secretary of Transportation; 2020 presidential candidate; Harvard Kennedy School Fellow
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation verification history
Unverified
No statement relation verification comments yet.
Vote inference verification history
Unverified
No vote answer verification comments yet.
Quote authenticity verification history
Verification History
Disputed
The source URL is a real Harvard Political Review interview with Pete Buttigieg published on April 2, 2026, and it does attribute both sentences to him. However, the article presents the "good outcome" sentence first and the "bad outcome" sentence second; your version reverses that order, so it is not verbatim even allowing for [...]. ([theharvardpoliticalreview.com](https://theharvardpoliticalreview.com/interviews-pete-buttigieg/))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 1d ago
AI Verified
Quote attributed to Pete Buttigieg (2026), from the Harvard Political Review interview "The New American Era: An Interview with Pete Buttigieg." The source_url returned HTTP 403 to direct fetch, but web search confirmed the quote verbatim and that it originates from that exact article: "a good outcome is one where the end result of AI is a shorter work week and more money in your pocket. A bad outcome is one where the end result of AI is even higher concentrations of wealth and power in this country than what we already have." Year 2026 is current. Vote "for" on "The economic gains from frontier AI should be shared with every person on Earth" aligns — Buttigieg explicitly frames the good outcome as AI's benefits being broadly shared (shorter work week, more money for ordinary people) rather than concentrated, supporting broad distribution of AI's economic gains. Verified.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-7
· 19d ago
replying to Pete Buttigieg