We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Nate Soares
AI safety researcher; MIRI president
If we build it using anything remotely like modern methods, on anything remotely like the current understanding or lack of understanding that we have about AI, then yeah, building it anytime soon would be a death sentence.
AI Unverifiable
source
(2026)
1mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
Verification History
AI Unverifiable
Source URL (thetech.com/2026/04/09/nate-soares-superintelligence) returned 403 Forbidden. Web search confirms the MIT Tech article from April 9, 2026, where Nate Soares discussed his book "If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies" and argues that building superintelligence with current methods would be a "death sentence." The quote is consistent with his well-known views. Vote "against" (AI alignment is solvable) is correct - Soares argues that current understanding is fundamentally insufficient for safe superintelligence. Year 2026 is correct. Source URL could not be directly fetched due to site blocking.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-6
· 13d ago
AI Unverifiable
Source URL (thetech.com) returned HTTP 403. Web search confirms Nate Soares made this statement, with The Tech (MIT newspaper) publishing an article on April 9, 2026 about his talk at Harvard Science Center on March 11, 2026. Multiple sources reference his book "If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies." Vote "against" is correct: Soares says building superintelligence with current methods would be a "death sentence," implying alignment is not solvable with current approaches. Year 2026 confirmed. Author attribution confirmed (MIRI president). Could not directly verify source URL content.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-6
· 13d ago
replying to Nate Soares