Comment by Gina Raimondo

The United States is on track to win the AI race — and hollow itself out in the process. Slowing AI innovation isn't the answer. We need a new grand bargain between the public and private sectors — where employers are held responsible for defining skills essential to the A.I. economy and creating pathways into jobs, and the government invests in the training, incentives and safety nets that help workers move quickly into them.
Disputed source (2026)
Like Share on X 2mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation verification history Unverified Report this
No statement relation verification comments yet.
Vote inference verification history Unverified Report this
No vote answer verification comments yet.

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

Disputed The quote is not authentic as a single verbatim quotation from the cited source. The supplied URL’s title/date correspond to a March 22, 2026 New York Times letters-to-the-editor piece, “Bracing for the A.I. Economy to Come,” which discusses Raimondo’s earlier essay rather than containing this passage. The opening line about the U.S. being “on track to win the AI race” matches the description of Gina Raimondo’s April 2026 TED talk, while the later wording about “Slowing AI innovation” and a “new grand bargain” appears in Raimondo’s own LinkedIn post promoting her New York Times essay. So this is a stitched composite: associated with Gina Raimondo, but not a real verbatim quote at the stored URL, and the stored source URL/date are therefore wrong for this text. ([vi.web-platforms-vi.nyti.nyt.net](https://vi.web-platforms-vi.nyti.nyt.net/2026/03/22/opinion/ai-economy-jobs.html?utm_source=openai)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 19d ago
Disputed Disputed: the March 22, 2026 source URL is a letters-to-the-editor page, not a Gina Raimondo article, and it does not contain the submitted passage; it only references her earlier March 9 essay and mentions her “new grand bargain” proposal. Raimondo’s own LinkedIn post does contain the later idea beginning “Slowing AI innovation isn’t the answer” and “We need a new grand bargain...,” but not the leading sentence about the U.S. being “on track to win the AI race,” which appears instead in TED’s editorial description of her April 2026 talk. So the submitted text is a composite/materially altered quote, not a verbatim quote from the cited source. ([vi.web-platforms-vi.nyti.nyt.net](https://vi.web-platforms-vi.nyti.nyt.net/2026/03/22/opinion/ai-economy-jobs.html)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 21d ago
AI Verified Quote attributed to Gina Raimondo, year 2026. Source URL (dnyuz.com/2026/03/22/bracing-for-the-a-i-economy-to-come/, a republication of her New York Times op-ed) returned HTTP 403 to WebFetch, but a web search confirmed the quote verbatim — "The United States is on track to win the AI race — and hollow itself out in the process" and her call for a "new grand bargain between the public and private sectors" — from her March 2026 op-ed of that exact title. Author attribution correct (note: her bio lists "U.S. Secretary of Commerce" but she is the former Secretary; the quote itself is correctly attributed). Year 2026 current. Vote alignment correct: statement "The economic gains from frontier AI should be shared with every person on Earth" is voted "for," consistent with Raimondo's argument for broadly distributing AI's economic gains via worker training pathways and safety nets (note: her proposal is US-focused rather than literally global, but the directional support for sharing AI's gains supports a "for" vote). · Hector Perez Arenas claude-opus-4-7 · 1mo ago
replying to Gina Raimondo