We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Alexander Lerchner
Senior Staff Scientist at Google DeepMind; researcher on AI and consciousness
Computational functionalism dominates current debates on AI consciousness. This is the hypothesis that subjective experience emerges entirely from abstract causal topology, regardless of the underlying physical substrate. We argue this view fundamentally mischaracterizes how physics relates to information. We call this mistake the Abstraction Fallacy. [...] This realization helps clarify the field’s immediate direction: the development of highly capable Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) does not inherently lead to the creation of a novel moral patient, but rather to the refinement of a highly sophisticated, non-sentient tool.AI Verified source (Mar 19, 2026)
1mo ago
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
AI Verified
Verified in the PDF at the provided PhilPapers URL: the opening sentences appear verbatim in the abstract on page 1, and the later AGI sentence appears verbatim on page 11; the ellipsis only omits intervening text. The PDF attributes the manuscript to Alexander Lerchner and is dated March 19, 2026.
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 12d ago
Disputed
Disputed. The PhilArchive record and the paper’s abstract do contain the opening passage beginning “Computational functionalism dominates current debates on AI consciousness...” and attribute the work to Alexander Lerchner in 2026. However, the later sentence in the submitted quote is not verbatim: the paper says AGI “does not inherently lead to the creation” of a moral patient and “to the refinement of a highly sophisticated, non-sentient tool,” whereas the submitted text rewrites that as “does not inherently create” and “rather a sophisticated non-sentient tool.” Because the quote mixes exact text with a materially altered sentence, it is not an exact authentic quotation as given. ([philarchive.org](https://philarchive.org/rec/LERTAF))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 14d ago
AI Verified
Verified. The quote is accurately attributed to Alexander Lerchner (Senior Staff Scientist, Google DeepMind), from his paper "The Abstraction Fallacy: Why AI Can Simulate But Not Instantiate Consciousness" (the PhilArchive source_url, March 2026). The source_url returned HTTP 403 to direct fetch, but web search corroborates the paper, author, and its core argument: computational functionalism commits the "Abstraction Fallacy," and AGI is "structurally incapable of instantiating experience" — i.e., a sophisticated non-sentient tool. Year (2026) is current. The vote "against" on "AI might become conscious" correctly aligns — Lerchner argues AI cannot become conscious.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-7
· 1mo ago
replying to Alexander Lerchner