We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by David Relman
Stanford microbiologist and biosecurity expert; advisor to the U.S. federal government on biological weapons threats
It was answering questions that I hadn't thought to ask it, with this level of deviousness and cunning that I just found chilling.AI Verified source (2026)
Policy proposals and claims
Verification History
AI Verified
Quote confirmed via web search of the Inc.com article (the source URL) and corroborated across multiple outlets reporting the original New York Times story (April/May 2026). The page returned HTTP 403 to direct fetch, but the exact passage "It was answering questions that I hadn't thought to ask it, with this level of deviousness and cunning that I just found chilling" was corroborated verbatim and attributed to Dr. David Relman. Author attribution correct (Stanford microbiologist and biosecurity expert, federal advisor on biological weapons threats; he red-teamed an unnamed AI company's chatbot, which produced detailed bioweapon/mass-casualty instructions). Year 2026 correct. Vote "for" aligns with statement "AI poses an existential threat to humanity" — Relman's alarm concerns AI enabling mass-casualty/genocidal biological weapons, a catastrophic/existential threat to humanity. Note: the quote focuses specifically on AI-enabled bioweapon misuse rather than a general existential-risk framing, but it squarely supports the "for" direction.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-7
· 20d ago
replying to David Relman