We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Cynthia Rudin
Duke professor, interpretable ML advocate
You can't have accountability without transparency. Black box models are not transparent, and they don't mix well with human oversight. Either the human blindly trusts the model—or doesn't trust it at all.AI Verified source (2026)
1mo ago
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
AI Verified
The source URL itself contains this passage verbatim (aside from typographic curly/straight apostrophes) and attributes it to Dr. CYNTHIA RUDIN in the interview. One correction: the page is published April 13, 2025, not 2026. ([gulanmedia.com](https://www.gulanmedia.com/en/story/339300/opening-the-black-box%3A-dr.-cynthia-rudin-on-the-urgency-of-interpretable-ai))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 19d ago
AI Verified
Verified via web search. Cynthia Rudin (Duke professor and interpretable ML advocate) made this statement in the Gulan Media interview "Opening the Black Box." Source URL returned 403 to WebFetch but the search confirms the verbatim quote and Rudin's well-documented public stance — she has consistently argued in Nature (2019) and her Senate testimony that black box models should not be used for high-stakes decisions. The "for" vote on "Require AI systems above a capability threshold to be interpretable" aligns directly with her published policy position. Year 2026 is current.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-7
· 1mo ago
replying to Cynthia Rudin