We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Liron Shapira
Tech investor and AI risk commentator; host of Doom Debates podcast
The real extinction-level AI safety challenge, the reason we’re nowhere close to surviving superintelligence, is something else — something AI companies decided they won’t mention anymore, because it exposes their AI safety efforts as a shockingly inadequate facade. [...] It’s an excellent facade. It lets researchers, executives, and policymakers feel relieved that the “AI safety plan” box is checked. It just doesn’t do anything when the superintelligence comes.AI Verified source (Feb 12, 2026)
1mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation comments
AI Verified
The quote clearly implies support for the statement: it describes AI superintelligence as an "extinction-level" challenge, says humanity is "nowhere close to surviving" it, and warns current safety plans "don’t do anything when the superintelligence comes." That establishes the author views AI as posing an existential threat.
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 17d ago
Vote answer comments
AI Verified
The quote treats AI as an "extinction-level AI safety challenge" and says "we’re nowhere close to surviving superintelligence," which clearly implies an existential threat.
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 17d ago
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
AI Verified
The supplied Substack page titled “The Facade of AI Safety Will Crumble” contains the first quoted sentence verbatim and, later on the same page, the sentence beginning “It’s an excellent facade...” verbatim; the byline is “Liron Shapira” and the page date is Feb 12, 2026, so the stored author, date, source URL, and content are consistent with the source. ([lironshapira.substack.com](https://lironshapira.substack.com/p/the-facade-of-ai-safety-will-crumble))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 17d ago
Disputed
The source URL is a Feb. 12, 2026 Substack post by Liron Shapira, and it contains the second passage, including the idea that the “AI safety plan” box is checked. But the first sentence is not verbatim as submitted: the article says “is something else — something AI companies decided they won’t mention anymore,” not “is something AI companies decided they won’t mention anymore.” Because that omission is not marked with [...], the submitted quote is materially altered, though clearly derived from this article. ([lironshapira.substack.com](https://lironshapira.substack.com/p/the-facade-of-ai-safety-will-crumble))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 19d ago
AI Verified
Verified via web search. The essay "The Facade of AI Safety Will Crumble" by Liron Shapira was published on his Substack on February 12, 2026. The source URL returned 403 to WebFetch but search results confirm the article exists at that URL and contains exactly the language quoted, including the framing of AI safety efforts as a "shockingly inadequate facade" that "will crumble when superintelligence arrives." Vote "against" the statement "AI alignment is solvable" aligns with Shapira's well-known AI-doomer position - he argues current alignment approaches are fundamentally inadequate and "we're nowhere close to surviving superintelligence."
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-7
· 1mo ago
replying to Liron Shapira