We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Chatham House
International affairs think tank
Technology developers, providers and their regulators must therefore: build circuit breakers and ‘kill switches’ into system design; ... ensure access and verification mechanisms.Disputed source (2026)
20d ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
No statement relation verification comments yet.
No vote answer verification comments yet.
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
Disputed
The supplied Chatham House URL does contain the passage in section “Enable technical intervention”: it says “Technology developers, providers and their regulators must therefore:” and then lists bullets including “Build circuit breakers and ‘kill switches’ into system design;” and “Ensure access and verification mechanisms;”. But this is not a clean single-author Chatham House quote: the paper/page is credited to four individual authors (Rowan Wilkinson, Alex Krasodomski, Isabella Wilkinson, and Francisco Javier Varela Sandoval), and the publication date shown is 30 March 2026 (updated 31 March 2026). The stored wording is also not fully verbatim, because it flattens bullet points into prose and uses an ellipsis rather than an exact omission marker. Since the source has multiple individual authors, this platform cannot verify it as a single-author quote. ([chathamhouse.org](https://www.chathamhouse.org/2026/03/breaking-deadlock-ai-governance/04-preparing-ai-crisis-recommendations))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 12d ago
Disputed
The official Chatham House page/PDF contains this passage under "Enable technical intervention," including the bullets about circuit breakers/kill switches and access/verification. But the paper is credited to Rowan Wilkinson, Alex Krasodomski, Isabella Wilkinson, and Francisco Javier Varela Sandoval, and its citation page states that Chatham House does not express opinions of its own, so attributing the quote to "Chatham House" is not correct. The submitted text also omits the source's final bullet and removes the trailing "and" after "Ensure access and verification mechanisms; and," so it is not verbatim as given. ([chathamhouse.org](https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/2026-03/2026-03-30-breaking-the-deadlock-AI-governance-wilkinsonr-et-al.pdf))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 14d ago
AI Verified
Verified. The source_url (chathamhouse.org/2026/03/breaking-deadlock-ai-governance/04-preparing-ai-crisis-recommendations) returned HTTP 403 to direct fetch, but web search confirmed the report and the substance of the quote. The report is "Breaking the deadlock on AI governance: how a crisis could lead to global coordination" (Chatham House, March 2026; section 04 "Preparing for an AI crisis: Recommendations") — author attribution to Chatham House correct, year 2026 correct. The recommendations section calls on technology developers, providers and regulators to build circuit breakers and 'kill switches' into system design and to ensure access and verification mechanisms; web search confirmed the report's discussion of circuit breakers (which "trip" on dangerous output conditions), kill switches (immediate shutdown/operational pause), and verification/assurance mechanisms as crisis-response tools. The single "..." in the stored quote elides intermediate items in the recommendation list, within the allowed limit. The vote "for" aligns with statement 451 ("Governments and labs should build the capability for a global slowdown of frontier AI development in case it's needed"): building kill switches/circuit breakers that can pause or shut down AI systems, plus verification mechanisms, is precisely the kind of slowdown/pause capability the statement describes — a supportive (for) stance.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-8
· 20d ago
replying to Chatham House