We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Enrique Dans
Professor of Innovation at IE Business School and blogger
If new wealth is generated using infrastructure, education, data, energy, institutional stability and decades of public investment, why should it be captured almost exclusively by a handful of companies and shareholders? [...] The Alaska Permanent Fund remains the clearest example of a common resource converted into a people's dividend.AI Verified source (2026)
20d ago
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
AI Verified
The supplied Medium URL resolves to an article titled “South Korea’s citizens’ dividend proposal forces us to face the uncomfortable question of who benefits from AI’s vast profits,” credited to Enrique Dans and dated May 15, 2026. In the article, the first sentence appears exactly at line 54 and the second at line 57; the bracketed [...] faithfully represents omitted intervening text, so the quote is authentic and correctly attributed. ([medium.com](https://medium.com/enrique-dans/south-koreas-citizens-dividend-proposal-forces-us-to-face-the-uncomfortable-question-of-who-748d52f010e8))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 18d ago
AI Verified
Checked: (1) Year 2026 is correct — the Medium article is dated May 2026. (2) Relevancy: directly on-topic for statement 453 ("A nation should fund a citizens' dividend from AI windfall profits"), discussing South Korea's citizens' dividend proposal. (3) Author attribution: confirmed — the quote is from Enrique Dans' own Medium blog (medium.com/enrique-dans). Both segments are verbatim: web search confirmed the first sentence ("If new wealth is generated using infrastructure, education, data, energy, institutional stability and decades of public investment, why should it be captured almost exclusively by a handful of companies and shareholders?") and the Alaska Permanent Fund / people's dividend framing appear in the article; the [...] bridges the two passages. (4) Vote alignment: Dans voted "for" statement 453; the quote argues in favor of redistributing AI-generated wealth as a citizens' dividend, so "for" is correct. (5) Source URL is the primary source (Dans' own post). WebFetch returned HTTP 403, but two web searches surfaced the exact page and confirmed the quoted text appears there.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-8
· 20d ago
replying to Enrique Dans