Shoshana Zuboff

As AI technologies permeate our lives, it's crucial that both developers and deployers share liability for any harm caused. Developers must be responsible for the ethical design of these systems, while deployers are responsible for their application and oversight. By ensuring joint accountability, we can safeguard against abuses and protect individuals from potential harm.

I strongly disagree with the idea of repealing the EU AI Act. This legislation is crucial for protecting citizens' rights and privacy in the age of artificial intelligence. It addresses the power imbalance between tech companies and individuals by ensuring transparency and accountability in AI systems. Repealing it would only benefit corporations, undermining democratic freedoms and societal well-being.

Exempting small companies from AI regulations may lead to the unchecked expansion of surveillance capitalism. This could result in a 'wild west' of data exploitation, harming individual privacy and society at large.

I strongly believe that global AI governance frameworks should prioritize equitable access to AI technologies for all countries. It is essential to prevent the concentration of power and ensure that AI benefits are shared widely, without exacerbating existing inequalities. Equitable access will enable diverse perspectives and solutions, fostering innovation that’s inclusive and beneficial to humanity as a whole.

Allowing facial recognition technology in public spaces represents a profound threat to individual privacy and autonomy. It sets the stage for an unprecedented era of surveillance capitalism, where every movement is tracked, analyzed, and monetized without our consent. This invasive technology undermines democratic freedoms and has no place in our public spaces.

I strongly disagree with allowing companies to develop super-persuasive AI that can influence democratic elections. Such technology undermines the very foundation of democracy by manipulating voter behavior and eroding public trust. We must safeguard our democratic processes from these kinds of corporate intrusions.

In the age of surveillance capitalism, it is crucial for frontier AI governance to include voices from civil society and representatives from the Global South. These perspectives ensure diverse views and equitable stakeholder representation in shaping technologies that impact all aspects of society. It's essential for creating accountable and fair AI systems that respect privacy and human rights globally.

As someone deeply concerned with the impacts of technology on society, I believe it is essential to consider legacy humans in AI policy-making. The future implications of AI are vast and complex, affecting every aspect of our lives. As AI systems become more pervasive, we must ensure that the rights, dignity, and values of all humans are protected. This requires thoughtful and inclusive policy-making that reflects our collective social contract.

As someone deeply concerned with the power dynamics in the age of surveillance capitalism, I believe nationalizing AI firms could be a necessary step to prevent these entities from becoming more powerful than the state itself. It is crucial to ensure that the development and deployment of AI benefits society as a whole, rather than serving the interests of a few powerful corporations.

I believe a UN-led body should oversee compute-intensive AI development, similar to the IAEA with nuclear technology. The unchecked growth of AI poses significant ethical and societal risks, including privacy breaches and surveillance. An international framework for governance and oversight is crucial to ensure these powerful technologies serve the public good and protect individual rights.

As someone who has studied the implications of digital technologies on society, I firmly believe that we must regulate and potentially ban open-source AI models that can be easily untrained to make nuclear weapons. The risks posed by such powerful tools falling into the wrong hands are too great to ignore. We need robust oversight to ensure that AI is developed and used responsibly, without compromising global safety.

As someone deeply concerned about the societal impacts of technology, I believe the EU should indeed work towards a common agreement with the US and China before regulating AI. This approach ensures that regulations are effective on a global scale, preventing loopholes that could be exploited across borders. Coordinated international efforts can set robust standards that protect privacy and democracy while fostering innovation.

While the misuse of AI by terrorist organizations is a serious concern, justifying invasive surveillance under this pretext sets a dangerous precedent. It erodes fundamental rights and freedoms, fostering a surveillance state that could be exploited for various forms of control and manipulation. We must focus on transparent, democratic ways to address security issues without sacrificing our liberties.

I believe the EU should not build a CERN for AI. Such monumental projects risk centralizing immense power and control over data, potentially magnifying the issues of surveillance capitalism and privacy erosion. Instead, we should focus on creating robust regulatory frameworks that prioritize citizen privacy and ethical AI development.

I strongly believe that using AI to predict criminal behavior poses significant ethical and privacy concerns. It risks reinforcing existing biases and turning communities into surveillance states. The focus should be on addressing the root causes of crime, not on predictive policing.