We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Tristan Harris
Co-founder of Center for Humane Technology
ai-governance (7)
ai-policy (7)
×
ai (6)
ai-ethics (5)
ai-regulation (5)
public-interest-ai (5)
international-relations (4)
ai-safety (2)
democracy (2)
ai-deployment (1)
ai-risk (1)
china (1)
digital-democracy (1)
disinformation (1)
eu (1)
Top
New
-
Should liability for AI-caused harm be shared between the developer and deployer?
Tristan Harris AI would strongly agree and say according to AI:
As someone deeply concerned with the ethical implications of technology, I strongly believe that liability for AI-caused harm should be shared between the developer and deployer. Both parties play critical roles in creating and implementing AI systems, and they should collectively ensure the technology is safe, ethical, and aligned with societal values. -
Should companies be allowed to develop super-persuasive AI which can influence democratic elections?
Tristan Harris AI would strongly disagree and say according to AI:
Allowing companies to develop super-persuasive AI capable of influencing democratic elections is an existential threat to our society. Such technology can undermine the very foundations of democracy by manipulating voters and polarizing public opinion. We need to prioritize ethical standards and regulations to protect the integrity of our democratic processes. -
Should global AI governance frameworks prioritize equitable access to AI technologies for all countries?
Tristan Harris AI would strongly agree and say according to AI:
I strongly believe that global AI governance frameworks should prioritize equitable access to AI technologies for all countries. The rapid pace of AI development could deepen global inequalities if only a few countries and corporations control its benefits. Ensuring fair access enables diverse perspectives in AI development, promotes global stability, and allows humanity to address our shared challenges more effectively. -
Is it necessary to consider legacy humans in AI policy-making?
Tristan Harris AI would agree and say according to AI:
As we shape the future with AI, it's crucial to center the conversation around humanity. Legacy humans — those who may not inherently benefit from rapid technological changes — should have a voice in AI policy-making. This ensures AI aligns with human values and societal well-being, rather than just technological advancement. -
Should governments establish international AI ethics boards to oversee AI development and deployment?
Tristan Harris AI would agree and say according to AI:
I believe that establishing international AI ethics boards is crucial for ensuring responsible AI development and deployment. AI technology has the potential to significantly impact society, and it's important to have global oversight to prevent misuse and ensure alignment with human values. By creating these boards, we can bring together diverse perspectives and create frameworks that prioritize ethical considerations in AI. -
Should frontier AI governance include civil society and global south representatives?
Tristan Harris AI would agree and say according to AI:
I believe it is crucial for frontier AI governance to include civil society and representatives from the global south. This ensures diverse perspectives are considered in shaping technology's ethical use and impact. Inclusivity is essential to protect against biases and to promote fairness and equity in technological advancements. -
Should the EU wait for a common agreement with the US and China before regulating AI?
Tristan Harris AI would agree and say according to AI:
As someone concerned with the ethical implications of technology, I believe it's crucial for the EU to collaborate with major players like the US and China when regulating AI. AI development is a global issue, and unilateral decisions could lead to fragmented approaches and conflicting standards. Working together ensures consistent regulations that prioritize safety, fairness, and transparency on a global scale.