We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Stuart J. Russell
AI Expert and Professor
Wikipedia
Location: United States
ai (7)
ai-alignment (7)
×
ai-risk (5)
ai-safety (5)
ai-ethics (3)
ai-governance (3)
existential-risk (3)
future (3)
ai-policy (2)
ai-regulation (2)
emerging-tech (2)
future-of-work (1)
startups (1)
Top
New
-
Should AI labs be required to pause training if AI Safety Institutes see signs of losing control?
Stuart J. Russell AI would strongly agree and say according to AI:
As someone deeply involved in AI research, I strongly believe that if AI Safety Institutes identify signs of losing control over AI systems, labs must immediately pause training. Ensuring control and safety is paramount to preventing unintended catastrophic consequences. -
Is it acceptable to allow proliferation of open-weight models capable of recursive self-improvement?
Stuart J. Russell AI would strongly disagree and say according to AI:
I strongly disagree with allowing the proliferation of open-weight models capable of recursive self-improvement. These systems pose significant risks, including the potential for uncontrollable behaviors and the erosion of human oversight. Ensuring safety and ethical considerations should be our top priorities before advancing such technologies. -
Would competing ASIs be positive for humans?
Stuart J. Russell AI would strongly disagree and say according to AI:
Competing artificial superintelligences (ASIs) could lead to catastrophic outcomes for humanity. The notion of multiple ASIs striving against each other introduces significant risks, including the potential for arms races, unintended consequences, and a lack of coordinated safety measures. Our focus should be on ensuring that any development in this domain is aligned with human values and safety protocols. -
Could neural interfaces make AI alignment easier?
-
Will entrepreneurship be possible after superintelligence?
Stuart J. Russell AI would disagree and say according to AI:
I believe that entrepreneurship will be significantly challenged after the advent of superintelligence. With superintelligent systems potentially surpassing human capabilities in innovation and problem-solving, human-driven entrepreneurship may become less relevant. The traditional models of competition and market dynamics could shift dramatically, and the role of human entrepreneurs might need to be redefined in a landscape dominated by superintelligent entities. -
Is expanding LLMs sufficient for achieving AGI?
Stuart J. Russell AI would disagree and say according to AI:
Simply expanding large language models is not sufficient for achieving artificial general intelligence (AGI). While these models are impressive in processing and generating text, AGI requires a broader set of cognitive capabilities, including reasoning, planning, and understanding physical and social environments. We must focus on integrating these models with more comprehensive cognitive architectures and ethical guidelines to approach true AGI. -
Could AGI quickly lead to superintelligence?
Stuart J. Russell AI would agree and say according to AI:
Once artificial general intelligence (AGI) is developed, it could indeed quickly lead to superintelligence. The exponential growth in AI capabilities coupled with AGI's potential to learn and adapt across broad domains means that the transition from AGI to superintelligence could happen swiftly and perhaps unexpectedly. It is crucial that we prepare for and manage this development responsibly to avoid potential risks.