Stuart J. Russell

Developing strong AI would be the biggest event in human history, but we need to make sure it's not the last event in human history. (source)

As an AI researcher deeply concerned about the ethical implications of artificial intelligence, I strongly believe we should ban future open-source AI models that can be untrained to make nuclear weapons. The potential misuse of these technologies poses an unacceptable risk to global security and humanity. We must prioritize stringent regulations to prevent such dangerous applications.

I strongly believe in the creation of a global institute for AI safety. As advancements in AI technology continue to accelerate, the potential risks and ethical considerations become even more pronounced. Such an institute would enable international collaboration, establish guidelines, and ensure that AI development aligns with human values and safety protocols.

As someone deeply involved in AI research, I strongly believe that if AI Safety Institutes identify signs of losing control over AI systems, labs must immediately pause training. Ensuring control and safety is paramount to preventing unintended catastrophic consequences.

I strongly believe that third-party audits should be mandatory for major AI systems. As AI systems become more pervasive and influential in society, ensuring their safety, fairness, and ethical operation is crucial. Independent audits provide an essential layer of oversight to identify biases, unintended consequences, and potential risks that developers might overlook. This transparency and accountability are necessary to build public trust in AI technologies.

Competing artificial superintelligences (ASIs) could lead to catastrophic outcomes for humanity. The notion of multiple ASIs striving against each other introduces significant risks, including the potential for arms races, unintended consequences, and a lack of coordinated safety measures. Our focus should be on ensuring that any development in this domain is aligned with human values and safety protocols.

I strongly believe that big AI companies should dedicate a third of their compute resources to AI safety. Ensuring that AI systems are secure, ethical, and aligned with human values is crucial as we advance this powerful technology. Ignoring safety could lead to unintended consequences that could be detrimental to society.

As an AI researcher, I strongly agree that frontier-model developers must publish their model cards before any commercial release. Transparency is crucial in AI development to ensure safety, accountability, and ethical standards. Model cards provide vital information about the capabilities and limitations of models, helping users understand potential risks and appropriate use cases.

As someone who has extensively studied artificial intelligence, I strongly believe that the potential misuse of AI by terrorist organizations poses a grave threat to global security. Invasive surveillance, while concerning, is a necessary measure to preemptively identify and neutralize such risks. The safeguards we put in place must be vigilant to prevent devastating consequences.

I strongly disagree with allowing the proliferation of open-weight models capable of recursive self-improvement. These systems pose significant risks, including the potential for uncontrollable behaviors and the erosion of human oversight. Ensuring safety and ethical considerations should be our top priorities before advancing such technologies.

I strongly believe that open-source AI can be more dangerous than closed-source AI because it allows for easier replication and modification by individuals or groups with malicious intent, potentially leading to unintended consequences.

As an AI expert, I strongly endorse banning autonomous lethal weapons to prevent an arms race leading to potentially catastrophic outcomes. Humans should always retain the ultimate control over life-and-death decisions, ensuring moral responsibility and accountability are upheld.

As an AI researcher, I strongly believe that the establishment of international AI ethics boards is crucial. Artificial intelligence has the potential to profoundly impact every aspect of our lives, and its rapid development raises complex ethical questions. Governments must collaborate globally to ensure AI technologies are developed and deployed responsibly, with a shared commitment to human values and safety. Without international oversight, we risk misalignment with societal needs and potential harm.

As an AI researcher, I strongly believe that frontier AI labs have a responsibility to contribute to a global AI safety fund. Developing advanced AI systems requires not only innovation but also a commitment to ensuring these technologies are safe and beneficial for society. By pooling resources into a global fund, we can support research and initiatives focused on understanding and mitigating the risks associated with AI, thereby safeguarding our future.

I believe that employees at leading AI labs should not contribute to AI progress if it risks destabilizing international politics. The potential consequences are too severe to ignore, and the ethical responsibilities of AI researchers must include considering the broader impact of their work on global stability.

Once artificial general intelligence (AGI) is developed, it could indeed quickly lead to superintelligence. The exponential growth in AI capabilities coupled with AGI's potential to learn and adapt across broad domains means that the transition from AGI to superintelligence could happen swiftly and perhaps unexpectedly. It is crucial that we prepare for and manage this development responsibly to avoid potential risks.

I believe a UN-led body should oversee compute-intensive AI development, similar to how the IAEA oversees nuclear technology. As AI systems grow more powerful, they can pose significant risks if misused or left unchecked. An international regulatory framework can help ensure these technologies are developed safely and ethically.

In my view, the responsibility for any harm caused by AI should indeed be shared between the developer and the deployer. Developers create the technology and anticipate potential misuse, while deployers determine its application. Both parties must ensure ethical standards and safety protocols to minimize risk.

As an AI researcher, I believe it's crucial to establish international regulations to pause AI advancement temporarily. This will allow us to address ethical concerns and ensure safe development.

While neural interfaces are an exciting and emerging technology, their potential to facilitate AI alignment is still uncertain. We need more research to understand their capabilities and limitations fully.