IBM on Require human-in-the-loop oversight for…

IBM

Technology company; policy division page

In systems that will inform credit decisions, clinical recommendations or public benefits eligibility, it is not. And the answer is not only adding a human to the process. It is ensuring that a human has the domain expertise and the means to interrogate what the model cannot explain.

Disputed source (Jun 17, 2026)

3mo ago

Policy proposals and claims

Require human-in-the-loop oversight for agentic AI systems acting in high-stakes domains

votes For

Statement relation verification history Unverified Report this

No statement relation verification comments yet.

Vote inference verification history Unverified Report this

No vote answer verification comments yet.

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Disputed The quoted text appears verbatim in the IBM Think article at the provided URL. The page is titled “Why ‘human in the loop’ alone is not a governance strategy,” lists the byline as Phaedra Boinodiris and Jamie Mackenzie, and shows Published 17 June 2026. So the content, source URL, and date match, but the attribution to “IBM” is not the canonical author attribution. Because the source has multiple individual authors rather than a single author or an organization speaking on its own behalf, this platform cannot verify it as a single-author IBM quote. · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 3mo ago

replying to IBM

Other opinions from IBM

See all

IBM votes For

Replace cookie banners with automated privacy signals from your browser or device that websites and apps must obey

We also honor your opt-out preference by recognizing user-enabled Global Privacy Control (GPC) as a valid opt-out requests (on the browsers or browser extensions that support such a signal).

AI Verified source (Jun 2, 2026)