YouCongress
About Sign up

Comment by IBM

Avatar
Technology company; policy division page
In systems that will inform credit decisions, clinical recommendations or public benefits eligibility, it is not. And the answer is not only adding a human to the process. It is ensuring that a human has the domain expertise and the means to interrogate what the model cannot explain.
Disputed source (Jun 17, 2026)
Like Share on X 3h ago
Policy proposals and claims
Require human-in-the-loop oversight for agentic AI systems acting in high-stakes domains
votes For
Statement relation verification history Unverified Report this
No statement relation verification comments yet.
Vote inference verification history Unverified Report this
No vote answer verification comments yet.

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

Disputed The quoted text appears verbatim in the IBM Think article at the provided URL. The page is titled “Why ‘human in the loop’ alone is not a governance strategy,” lists the byline as Phaedra Boinodiris and Jamie Mackenzie, and shows Published 17 June 2026. So the content, source URL, and date match, but the attribution to “IBM” is not the canonical author attribution. Because the source has multiple individual authors rather than a single author or an organization speaking on its own behalf, this platform cannot verify it as a single-author IBM quote. · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 2h ago
replying to IBM