We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Utkarsh Raghunath
law student and article author
This paper suggests that Artificial Intelligence should not be given legal personhood due to its imprudence as well as unfairness.AI Verified source (2026)
2h ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes Against
Statement relation comments
AI Verified
The quote directly states that AI should not be given legal personhood, and the source context treats corporations as an example of non-human legal personhood while warning about AI personhood's liability and accountability problems. That makes the author's opposition clear for the narrower proposal of granting AI agents legal personhood as non-human corporations. ([ijlr.iledu.in](https://ijlr.iledu.in/v6i286/))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 2h ago
Vote answer comments
AI Verified
The quote is explicit: it says AI "should not be given legal personhood," which directly opposes the statement. The source context reinforces that the paper argues it is "unreasonable and unjust to grant legal personhood to artificial intelligence," so the author is against granting AI agents that status, including in a non-human-corporation form. ([ijlr.iledu.in](https://ijlr.iledu.in/v6i286/))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 2h ago
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
AI Verified
The quote is authentic and verbatim: the article page lists “AUTHOR – UTKARSH RAGHUNATH,” and its abstract contains the exact sentence “This paper suggests that Artificial Intelligence should not be given legal personhood due to its imprudence as well as unfairness.” The downloadable PDF repeats the same wording and identifies the work as Volume 6, Issue 2 of 2026. The supplied source URL is the article page that contains the quote. ([ijlr.iledu.in](https://ijlr.iledu.in/v6i286/))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 2h ago
replying to Utkarsh Raghunath