We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Michael Pollan
Journalist; bestselling nonfiction author
[...] have to think about granting them personhood, for example, the way we've granted corporations personhood. I think that would be insane.AI Verified source (Feb 19, 2026)
4h ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes Against
Statement relation comments
AI Verified
In the article section about moral obligations to chatbots, Pollan says granting chatbots personhood like corporations would be "insane" and that giving them rights would make people lose control of them. That clearly shows opposition to granting AI agents legal personhood as non-human corporations. ([kpbs.org](https://www.kpbs.org/news/science-technology/2026/02/19/michael-pollan-says-ai-may-think-but-it-will-never-be-conscious))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 4h ago
Vote answer comments
AI Verified
In context, Pollan says granting AI personhood like corporations "would be insane" and that "giving them rights" would make humans "lose control of them completely," which is explicit opposition to the statement. ([kpbs.org](https://www.kpbs.org/news/science-technology/2026/02/19/michael-pollan-says-ai-may-think-but-it-will-never-be-conscious))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 4h ago
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
AI Verified
Verified. The Fresh Air transcript labels this answer as spoken by POLLAN and contains the matching passage about granting chatbots personhood and calling that idea insane. The provided KPBS page reproduces the same passage under "Interview highlights" and is published on February 19, 2026, so the stored author, date, source URL, and quoted text are correct. ([freshairarchive.org](https://freshairarchive.org/segments/michael-pollan-says-ai-may-think-it-will-never-be-conscious))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 4h ago
replying to Michael Pollan