Comment by KRISTA RAMONAS, MD, FAAO

General advice suggests that one egg per day is likely neutral for cardiovascular disease risk, provided the rest of the diet is healthy.
AI Verified source (Jun 2026)
Like Share on X 1h ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes Against
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified Relevant: the quote directly addresses the complete claim by discussing whether regular egg consumption changes cardiovascular disease risk, and it says one egg per day is likely neutral rather than risk-increasing; the surrounding post is explicitly about the egg–heart disease relationship. ([linkedin.com](https://www.linkedin.com/posts/labxmd_eggs-femalelongevity-longevitymedicine-activity-7469751493009801217-pBWK)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 1h ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified The author is most likely against: the post says "one egg per day is likely neutral for cardiovascular disease risk" and also mentions "no significant association" with egg intake, which opposes the blanket claim that regularly eating eggs increases cardiovascular disease risk; the only caveat is that higher intake is "more nuanced." ([linkedin.com](https://www.linkedin.com/posts/labxmd_eggs-femalelongevity-longevitymedicine-activity-7469751493009801217-pBWK)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 1h ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified The supplied LinkedIn post is fetchable and contains this sentence verbatim in the body of KRISTA RAMONAS, MD, FAAO’s post, with the page explicitly attributing the post to her. The page also shows the post as “3w” old, which is consistent with the stored month-level date of June 2026. ([linkedin.com](https://www.linkedin.com/posts/labxmd_eggs-femalelongevity-longevitymedicine-activity-7469751493009801217-pBWK)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 1h ago
replying to KRISTA RAMONAS, MD, FAAO