Comment by Peter Miller

COVID-19 origins researcher and Rootclaim debate participant
Which of those 2 bayesian analysis is correct? The answer depends entirely on the quality of the data analysis, and has nothing to do with that final step where you just multiply a few numbers together to get the answer.
AI Verified (Feb 4, 2025)
Like Share on X 2h ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes Against
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified Relevant: in context, Miller says opposite Bayesian analyses can be produced from the same data and that the result turns on the underlying data analysis, not the Bayesian 'multiply a few numbers' step. He later contrasts Bayesian fraction-multiplying with high-quality analysis of the evidence, so the quote is directly about whether Bayesian analysis is the right framework for settling COVID origins and makes a definite stance substantially more likely. ([statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu](https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2025/02/03/bayesian-analysis-of-origins-of-covid/)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 2h ago
Vote inference verification history Latest opinion AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified Against: he says the key issue 'depends entirely on the quality of the data analysis' and 'has nothing to do with that final step where you just multiply a few numbers together,' so he is rejecting the idea that the Bayesian calculation itself is the right way to settle COVID origins. In context, he further contrasts scientists' 'high quality analyses of the data' with 'guessing at fractions and multiplying them together,' reinforcing that inference. ([statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu](https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2025/02/03/bayesian-analysis-of-origins-of-covid/)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 2h ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified The source URL is fetchable and contains a comment attributed to Peter Miller on February 4, 2025; the exact quoted text appears verbatim in that comment, so the quote, author, date, and source URL all match. ([statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu](https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2025/02/03/bayesian-analysis-of-origins-of-covid/)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 2h ago
replying to Peter Miller