Comment by Andrew J. Broadbent

Virologist at the University of Surrey; coauthor of an ASM commentary on SARS-CoV-2 origins and lab-leak claims
The arguments are based on conjecture, correlation, and anecdote. Dr. Chan’s New York Times opinion piece misrepresents and underplays the existing scientific data supporting a zoonotic origin of SARS-CoV-2. There is currently no verified scientific evidence to support the lab leak hypothesis. Moreover, the assertions in the Chan article have been challenged by a growing body of scientific data supporting the zoonosis hypothesis. Dr. Chan’s five key points are well refuted by the data, as discussed in publicly accessible platforms by Dr. Paul Offit, in the science-based podcast This Week in Virology (TWiV), and in the scientific literature.
Unverified (Aug 1, 2024)
Like Share on X 2h ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes Against
Statement relation verification history Unverified Report this
No statement relation verification comments yet.
Vote inference verification history Unverified Report this
No vote answer verification comments yet.
replying to Andrew J. Broadbent