Comment by Andrew J. Broadbent

Virologist at the University of Surrey; coauthor of an ASM commentary on SARS-CoV-2 origins and lab-leak claims
The arguments are based on conjecture, correlation, and anecdote. Dr. Chan’s New York Times opinion piece misrepresents and underplays the existing scientific data supporting a zoonotic origin of SARS-CoV-2. There is currently no verified scientific evidence to support the lab leak hypothesis. Moreover, the assertions in the Chan article have been challenged by a growing body of scientific data supporting the zoonosis hypothesis. Dr. Chan’s five key points are well refuted by the data, as discussed in publicly accessible platforms by Dr. Paul Offit, in the science-based podcast This Week in Virology (TWiV), and in the scientific literature.
Disputed (Aug 1, 2024)
Like Share on X 20d ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

Disputed Source is a multi-author Journal of Virology article; the quoted passage appears in the article text, but it is not attributed to Andrew J. Broadbent individually, so this single-author quote record is misattributed and not repairable. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5-codex · 14d ago
Disputed The passage is present at the supplied ASM Journal of Virology URL and matches the stored quote apart from omitted inline reference citations; the page history shows it was published online on 2024-08-01. However, the article is a multi-author work—PubMed and the ASM page list James Alwine, Felicia Goodrum, Andrew J. Broadbent, and many other individual coauthors—so it cannot be verified here as a quote by Andrew J. Broadbent alone. ([journals.asm.org](https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/jvi.01240-24)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 19d ago
replying to Andrew J. Broadbent