Comment by John Janik

Physicist and Substack author writing on COVID-19 origins and Bayesian analysis
The WHO’s own expert panel published its final report. When you apply formal probability to their findings, the conclusions point somewhere the authors were unwilling to go.
AI Unverifiable (Feb 28, 2026)
Like Share on X 1h ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation verification history Unverified Report this
No statement relation verification comments yet.
Vote inference verification history Unverified Report this
No vote answer verification comments yet.

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Unverifiable I could not verify this quote. The supplied URL resolves to a Substack page for “Dr. John Janik,” but the fetchable page only shows a JavaScript-required gate and not the article text, so the quoted sentence cannot be checked there. The submitter’s provided source passage is only a bibliographic citation line and does not contain the quote. Exact-web searches for the quote text and article title did not surface a fetchable copy or snippet containing the sentence. ([open.substack.com](https://open.substack.com/pub/johnjanik/p/the-math-doesnt-lie-a-bayesian-analysis?r=31yu6j&showWelcomeOnShare=true&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 1h ago
replying to John Janik