YouCongress
About Sign up

Comment by Lord Rees of Ludlow

Human avatar
Astronomer Royal and Crossbench life peer in the UK House of Lords.
Machines supplement, if not replace, white-collar jobs, routine legal work, accountancy and even surgery. This clearly needs regulation at a national level.
AI Verified (Jun 4, 2026)
Source:
UK Parliament, House of Lords, “AI Regulation Bill,” 4 June 2026.
Like Share on X 20d ago

Policy proposals and claims

Require AI labs to publish safety evaluations before deploying frontier models
votes For
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified Official Hansard transcript, House of Lords AI Regulation Bill debate, 4 June 2026, lines 155–161: the author says AI’s workplace impacts clearly need national regulation; this is relevant and strongly indicates support for a frontier-model safety-evaluation requirement. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 20d ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified Official Hansard transcript, House of Lords AI Regulation Bill debate, 4 June 2026, lines 155–161: author says AI clearly needs national regulation; “for” the safety-evaluation requirement is the most likely position. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 20d ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified Official Hansard transcript, House of Lords AI Regulation Bill debate, 4 June 2026, lines 155–158: Lord Rees directly says the stored wording that AI’s replacement/supplementing of work needs national regulation. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 20d ago
replying to Lord Rees of Ludlow