We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Thinking Machines Lab
AI research and product company publishing work on safe open-weight model releases.
Safe open-weight models are public goods, as they put AI development and safety work in many hands and make training choices inspectable.AI Verified (Jul 31, 2026)
Source:
A Safe Path to Open Weights
1h ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes Against
Statement relation comments
AI Verified
The quote is about why open-weight models are beneficial for safety—public goods, many hands, and inspectable training choices—which directly bears on whether open-source/open-weight AI is more dangerous than closed-source AI and makes an opposing stance substantially more likely. ([thinkingmachines.ai](https://thinkingmachines.ai/blog/a-safe-path-to-open-weights/?utm_source=openai))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17
· 1h ago
Vote answer comments
AI Verified
Against. The source describes safe open-weight models as “public goods” that put AI development and safety work in many hands and make training choices inspectable, which supports openness rather than the claim that open-source AI is inherently more dangerous—though it does acknowledge real misuse risks. ([thinkingmachines.ai](https://thinkingmachines.ai/blog/a-safe-path-to-open-weights/))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17
· 1h ago
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
AI Verified
The quote appears verbatim in the article’s abstract: “Safe open-weight models are public goods, as they put AI development and safety work in many hands and make training choices inspectable.” The page is dated Jul 31, 2026 and is on Thinking Machines Lab’s site, so the quote, date, source URL, and attribution are supported. ([thinkingmachines.ai](https://thinkingmachines.ai/blog/a-safe-path-to-open-weights/))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17
· 1h ago
replying to Thinking Machines Lab