We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by David H. Freedman
Journalist: health, science, business, policy & society. The Atlantic, Politico, SciAm.
Well, there’s the fact that a universal basic income could add as much as $2 trillion in annual expenses to the U.S. budget. Then there’s the question of whether such a program might disconnect large swaths of our population from the positive aspects of working for a living—a potentially toxic side effect. And finally, there’s little convincing evidence that large-scale technological unemployment is actually happening or will happen in the immediate future. Advances are changing the types of tasks and skills in demand, displacing many workers from jobs that have become obsolete. But the massive, automation-fueled job displacement cited as the prime justification for a basic income won’t actually reach us for decades, assuming it does come.
AI Unverifiable
source
(2016)
Polls
Verification History
AI Unverifiable
Quote by David H. Freedman from MIT Technology Review article "Basic Income: A Sellout of the American Dream" (June 2016). Web search confirms the article exists and was authored by Freedman. The three arguments in the quote (UBI cost of $2 trillion, disconnection from work ethic, lack of evidence for imminent technological unemployment) match multiple independent summaries of the article's content. Vote "against" on "Implement a universal basic income" correctly reflects the quote's anti-UBI stance. Updated source_url from old format (/s/601499/) to canonical URL (/2016/06/13/159449/). Added year 2016. Marked ai_unverifiable because both technologyreview.com and freedman.com were blocked by egress proxy, preventing direct verification of the exact quote text on the source page.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-6
· 4d ago
replying to David H. Freedman