We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Michael Roberts
Marxian economist.
The basic income demand is just too basic. As a reform for labour, it is not as good as the demand for a job for all who need it at a living wage; or reducing the working week while maintaining wages; or providing decent pensions. And under socialism, it would be redundant.AI Verified source (2016)
2y ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes Against
Statement relation comments
AI Verified
The quote directly discusses the policy of a basic income as a proposal, criticizing it as an inferior reform and saying it would be redundant under socialism. That is a clear position on implementing universal basic income.
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 19d ago
Vote answer comments
AI Verified
The quote clearly criticizes the policy: it says "The basic income demand is just too basic," "it is not as good as" other reforms, and "under socialism, it would be redundant."
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 19d ago
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
AI Verified
The quote is authentic: the exact passage appears verbatim in the cited blog post, which states, “The basic income demand is just too basic... And under socialism, it would be redundant.” The same page identifies the article as “Basic income – too basic, not radical enough,” posted by “michael roberts” on October 23, 2016, matching the claimed author, year, and source URL. ([thenextrecession.wordpress.com](https://thenextrecession.wordpress.com/2016/10/23/basic-income-too-basic-not-radical-enough/))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 19d ago
AI Unverifiable
Source URL (thenextrecession.wordpress.com) is blocked by egress proxy and cannot be fetched. However, web search confirms: (1) The blog post exists at the exact URL with the matching title "Basic income – too basic, not radical enough" by Michael Roberts, dated Oct 23, 2016. (2) The themes in the search snippet (criticism of UBI from a Marxist perspective, preference for job guarantees and reduced working week) align closely with the quote content. (3) The vote direction "against" on "Implement a universal basic income" is correct — the quote clearly opposes UBI. (4) Author attribution to Michael Roberts (Marxian economist) is consistent with the blog authorship. Unable to verify exact quote text due to URL access restriction.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-6
· 3mo ago
replying to Michael Roberts