We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by European Laboratory for Learning and Intelligent Systems (ELLIS)
Pan-European AI research network
Ideas for a centralised approach in developing the European AI landscape run the risk of undermining the wider goals of the EU's AI strategy. While meeting no immediate need – AI research does not require access to centralised, expensive and unique physical facilities and infrastructures in the way that fields such as particle physics might require – a central research body risks isolating AI research from the sectors, research communities and citizens that it should serve. Faced with a situation where a centralised site in a single member country absorbs large parts of future EU funding, but not the talent (which is the most likely outcome), AI talent currently working at the most dynamic European centres of AI excellence may even consider moving to top AI hotspots overseas. A multi-centric laboratory with strong institutions in all parts of Europe will generate real innovation for Europe, best leverage Europe’s cultural diversity, and integrate European values in the development of future technology. This will ensure that Europe does not become a mere consumer of AI technology developed elsewhere, building on other values, but instead builds a genuine “AI made in Europe”.AI Verified source (2022)
Policy proposals and claims
votes Against
Statement relation comments
AI Verified
The quote clearly argues against a centralized, CERN-like AI institute: it says AI does not need the kind of centralized infrastructure particle physics does, warns a central research body would undermine broader goals, and explicitly favors a multi-centric model instead. That implies opposition to creating a global institute for AI similar to CERN.
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 17d ago
Vote answer comments
AI Verified
The quote clearly opposes a CERN-like central institute, saying a "centralised approach" and "a central research body" would risk undermining EU goals, and instead argues for "a multi-centric laboratory with strong institutions in all parts of Europe."
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 17d ago
votes Against
Statement relation comments
AI Verified
The quote directly addresses whether a European AI research body should be centralized in one location, arguing against a single central site and in favor of a multi-centric model. This matches the full statement about having a central hub in one location.
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 18d ago
Vote answer comments
AI Verified
The quote clearly rejects "a centralised site in a single member country" and instead says "A multi-centric laboratory with strong institutions in all parts of Europe will generate real innovation for Europe."
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 18d ago
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
AI Verified
The passage appears verbatim on the official ELLIS news page titled 'ELLIS is developing as an ambitious multi-centric European AI lighthouse moving forward,' dated 03/02/22. The text matches the quoted wording from 'Ideas for a centralised approach...' through 'AI made in Europe.' Because it is published on ELLIS's own site as an organizational statement/news post, attribution to the European Laboratory for Learning and Intelligent Systems (ELLIS) is supported. ([ellis.eu](https://ellis.eu/news/ambitious-multi-centric-european-ai-lighthouse-moving-forward))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 18d ago
AI Verified
Quote text matches ELLIS's February 2022 statement "Ambitious multi-centric European AI lighthouse moving forward," confirmed via web search. The exact phrasings ("AI research does not require access to centralised, expensive and unique physical facilities... in the way that fields such as particle physics might require"; multi-centric laboratory; "AI made in Europe") are all verified. Source URL is canonical ELLIS news page (returns 403 to WebFetch but valid; mirrored at fcai.fi/news/2022/2/3/...). Year added (was null) — set to 2022 based on the original publication. Vote "against" on "The CERN for AI should have a central hub in one location" aligns directly: ELLIS explicitly opposes a single centralised site and advocates for a multi-centric/distributed model.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-7
· 1mo ago
replying to European Laboratory for Learning and Intelligent Systems (ELLIS)