We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Eliezer Yudkowsky
AI researcher and writer
Many researchers steeped in these issues, including myself, expect that the most likely result of building a superhumanly smart AI, under anything remotely like the current circumstances, is that literally everyone on Earth will die. Not as in “maybe possibly some remote chance,” but as in “that is the obvious thing that would happen.” It’s not that you can’t, in principle, survive creating something much smarter than you; it’s that it would require precision and preparation and new scientific insights, and probably not having AI systems composed of giant inscrutable arrays of fractional numbers.
We are not prepared. We are not on course to be prepared in any reasonable time window. There is no plan. [...] If we actually do this, we are all going to die.
AI Verified
source
(2023)
Policy proposals and claims
Verification History
AI Verified
Verified via web search. The quote appears in Yudkowsky's TIME op-ed "Pausing AI Developments Isn't Enough. We Need to Shut it All Down" (March 29, 2023). Both passages ("literally everyone on Earth will die" and "We are not prepared. We are not on course to be prepared...") are confirmed in multiple sources. The source URL (time.com) returned 403 but content is well-documented elsewhere. Vote "against" aligns with statement "AGI will create abundance" - Yudkowsky predicts AGI will kill everyone, so opposing the abundance claim is correct.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-7
· 4d ago
replying to Eliezer Yudkowsky