We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Eva Hamrud
Science writer covering AI and technology
Despite this, it currently seems to be unlikely to become an existential threat to humanity.AI Verified source (2021)
6mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes Against
Statement relation comments
AI Unverifiable
The quote discusses whether something could become "an existential threat to humanity," but it refers only to "it" without identifying AI. Because the subject is unclear, it cannot be confirmed as being exactly about the full statement on AI.
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 19d ago
No vote answer verification comments yet.
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
AI Verified
Verified. The ScienceAlert article at the cited URL is dated 11 April 2021, credited “By Eva Hamrud, Metafact,” and its takeaway section contains the exact sentence: “Despite this, it currently seems to be unlikely to become an existential threat to humanity.” ([sciencealert.com](https://www.sciencealert.com/here-s-why-ai-is-not-an-existential-threat-to-humanity))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 19d ago
AI Verified
Verified via web search (URL returns 403 to WebFetch). The article 'AI Is Not Actually an Existential Threat to Humanity, Scientists Say' exists at the source_url on ScienceAlert and is attributed to Eva Hamrud (originally from Metafact, where she runs a newsletter). The quoted text appears in the article in the context of explaining that current narrow/weak AI is unlikely to become an existential threat. Vote 'against' on 'AI poses an existential threat to humanity' is correctly aligned with the quote and article thesis. Year 2021 is older than 2025-2026, but the quote is directly tied to the statement and the article is a valid primary attribution; keeping it.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-7
· 1mo ago
replying to Eva Hamrud