We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Frank Kendall III
Former U.S. Air Force Secretary
I care a lot about civil society and the rule of law, including laws of armed conflict. Our policies are written around compliance with those laws. You don't enforce laws against machines; you enforce them against people. And I think our challenge is not to somehow limit what we can do with AI, but it's to find a way to hold people accountable for what the AI does. [...] get it into field capabilities as quickly as we can. The critical parameter on the battlefield is time. And AI will be able to do much more complicated things much more accurately and much faster than human beings can. [...] We are still going to have to find ways to manage this technology, manage its application and hold human beings accountable for when it doesn't comply with the rules that we already have. I think that’s the approach we need to take.AI Verified source (2023)
Policy proposals and claims
votes Against
Statement relation verification history
AI Verified
Statement relation comments
AI Verified
The quote clearly implies opposition to the statement. The author says the challenge is "not to somehow limit what we can do with AI" and instead to "hold people accountable," while urging AI battlefield capabilities be fielded "as quickly as we can." That supports regulating use and responsibility under existing laws, not banning autonomous lethal weapons.
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 4d ago
Vote inference verification history
AI Verified
Vote answer comments
AI Verified
The quote argues "our challenge is not to somehow limit what we can do with AI" and to "get it into field capabilities as quickly as we can," favoring management and human accountability rather than a ban.
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 4d ago
votes For
Statement relation verification history
AI Verified
Statement relation comments
AI Verified
The quote is directly about AI use in military/defense settings and stresses responsible governance: compliance with the laws of armed conflict, managing AI’s application, and keeping humans accountable while deploying battlefield AI capabilities. That matches the full statement about promoting responsible use of AI in defense policy.
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 5d ago
Vote inference verification history
AI Verified
Vote answer comments
AI Verified
He supports defense AI use while stressing it must comply with the 'laws of armed conflict,' be 'manage[d]' in its application, and keep 'human beings accountable,' which clearly favors responsible use.
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 5d ago
Quote authenticity verification history
Verification History
AI Verified
Verified. The Defense One article at the supplied URL (published December 6, 2023) attributes these remarks to Frank Kendall and contains the same wording in direct quotations: the accountability passage appears together, and the later battlefield/time and human-accountability sentences appear later in the article. The user's [...] omit intervening text and reporter attributions, but the quoted wording itself matches aside from normal punctuation around those attributions. ([defenseone.com](https://www.defenseone.com/policy/2023/12/human-operators-must-be-held-accountable-ais-use-conflicts-air-force-secretary-says/392545/))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 5d ago
replying to Frank Kendall III