Comment by Frank Kendall III

I care a lot about civil society and the rule of law, including laws of armed conflict. Our policies are written around compliance with those laws. You don't enforce laws against machines; you enforce them against people. And I think our challenge is not to somehow limit what we can do with AI, but it's to find a way to hold people accountable for what the AI does. [...] get it into field capabilities as quickly as we can. The critical parameter on the battlefield is time. And AI will be able to do much more complicated things much more accurately and much faster than human beings can. [...] We are still going to have to find ways to manage this technology, manage its application and hold human beings accountable for when it doesn't comply with the rules that we already have. I think that’s the approach we need to take.
AI Verified source (2023)
Like Share on X 4mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes Against
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified The quote clearly implies opposition to the statement. The author says the challenge is "not to somehow limit what we can do with AI" and instead to "hold people accountable," while urging AI battlefield capabilities be fielded "as quickly as we can." That supports regulating use and responsibility under existing laws, not banning autonomous lethal weapons. · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 24d ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified The quote argues "our challenge is not to somehow limit what we can do with AI" and to "get it into field capabilities as quickly as we can," favoring management and human accountability rather than a ban. · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 24d ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified Verified. The Defense One article at the supplied URL (published December 6, 2023) attributes these remarks to Frank Kendall and contains the same wording in direct quotations: the accountability passage appears together, and the later battlefield/time and human-accountability sentences appear later in the article. The user's [...] omit intervening text and reporter attributions, but the quoted wording itself matches aside from normal punctuation around those attributions. ([defenseone.com](https://www.defenseone.com/policy/2023/12/human-operators-must-be-held-accountable-ais-use-conflicts-air-force-secretary-says/392545/)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 25d ago
replying to Frank Kendall III