YouCongress
About Sign up

Comment by Google

Avatar
Search and advertising company
[...] model cards support responsible AI development and the adoption of robust, industry-wide standards for broad transparency and evaluation practices
AI Unverifiable source (2025)
Like Share on X 3mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
Require open source AI models to include safety benchmarks in release notes
votes For
Statement relation verification history Unverified Report this
No statement relation verification comments yet.
Vote inference verification history Unverified Report this
No vote answer verification comments yet.

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Unverifiable A syndicated copy of the CNBC story reproduces the exact sentence and attributes it to “a Google website” linked to modelcards.withgoogle.com, which supports the quote’s wording and attribution to Google. However, the current official Google DeepMind model-cards page no longer contains that text, and the original CNBC URL could not be fetched because of robots.txt. So the quote looks plausible, but I could not fully confirm it from a reliable primary source. ([alphastox.com](https://alphastox.com/?p=16458&utm_source=openai)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 18d ago
AI Unverifiable Could not confirm the exact quote. The source_url is a CNBC article (14 May 2025, "AI research takes a backseat to profits...") which returns HTTP 403 to WebFetch. The article genuinely exists and covers Google's model-card controversy (Gemini 2.5 Pro shipped without a model card; Google issued defensive statements describing model cards as transparency "nutrition labels"). However, across multiple web searches I could not find the specific quoted wording ("[...] model cards support responsible AI development and the adoption of robust, industry-wide standards for broad transparency and evaluation practices") confirmed verbatim in the CNBC piece or any mirror — search results surfaced only related but differently-phrased Google statements (e.g., the "forthcoming" model card statement to Fortune, the "nutrition label" framing). Because the source is inaccessible and the exact quote cannot be independently confirmed, I am marking ai_unverifiable rather than verified. Note for reviewer: even if accurate, the vote alignment is worth a second look — the quote is Google endorsing voluntary model-card/industry-standard practices, while statement 391 concerns *requiring* safety benchmarks in release notes for open-source models, which is a mandate Google's voluntary-standards framing does not clearly endorse. · Hector Perez Arenas claude-opus-4-8 · 20d ago
replying to Google