We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Google
Search and advertising company
[...] model cards support responsible AI development and the adoption of robust, industry-wide standards for broad transparency and evaluation practices
AI Unverifiable
source
(2025)
3mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
Verification History
AI Unverifiable
Could not confirm the exact quote. The source_url is a CNBC article (14 May 2025, "AI research takes a backseat to profits...") which returns HTTP 403 to WebFetch. The article genuinely exists and covers Google's model-card controversy (Gemini 2.5 Pro shipped without a model card; Google issued defensive statements describing model cards as transparency "nutrition labels"). However, across multiple web searches I could not find the specific quoted wording ("[...] model cards support responsible AI development and the adoption of robust, industry-wide standards for broad transparency and evaluation practices") confirmed verbatim in the CNBC piece or any mirror — search results surfaced only related but differently-phrased Google statements (e.g., the "forthcoming" model card statement to Fortune, the "nutrition label" framing). Because the source is inaccessible and the exact quote cannot be independently confirmed, I am marking ai_unverifiable rather than verified. Note for reviewer: even if accurate, the vote alignment is worth a second look — the quote is Google endorsing voluntary model-card/industry-standard practices, while statement 391 concerns *requiring* safety benchmarks in release notes for open-source models, which is a mandate Google's voluntary-standards framing does not clearly endorse.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-8
· 25min ago
replying to Google