We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Liberties.EU
European civil liberties NGO
Not only does face recognition discriminate against people of colour, but it is also disproportionately targeted at marginalized individuals. In a law enforcement context, facial recognition is predominantly used in communities that are already over-policed. In Italy, for instance, the police’s facial recognition software database contained 2 million images of Italians, compared to 7 million of refugees and migrants. So the way this technology is used is likely to perpetuate the way people from some groups are already disproportionately targeted. [...] Facial recognition might seem attractive for its potential to simplify our lives and enhance public security. But it’s more likely to end up as a major inconvenience that makes it easy to remove our freedoms and choices and reinforce inequality and discrimination. It’s becoming more popular with governments, so the law has to catch up and stop this technology being used at all in most contexts. [...] We at Liberties seek to ban mass surveillance through facial recognition. A few months ago, we joined the ReclaimYourFace movement. If you agree that facial recognition has no place in our public spaces, sign the petition here.AI Verified source (2021)
Quote authenticity verification history
Verification History
AI Verified
ai_verified: The cited Liberties.eu article, “Facial Recognition: Pros And Cons,” is credited “by Liberties.EU” and dated August 3, 2021. The three passages in your quote appear verbatim on the page: the first at lines 87–88, the second at line 91, and the third at line 94. The [...] marks accurately represent omitted intervening text between non-contiguous passages. ([liberties.eu](https://www.liberties.eu/en/stories/pros-and-cons-of-facial-recognition/43708))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 5d ago
AI Unverifiable
The source_url (liberties.eu "Facial Recognition: Pros And Cons") returns HTTP 403 Forbidden to my fetcher. Web search confirms the quote is accurate: the Liberties.EU article states that face recognition discriminates against people of colour and is disproportionately targeted at marginalized/over-policed communities, cites the Italian police database containing 2 million images of Italians vs 7 million of refugees and migrants, calls for the law to stop this technology being used in most contexts, and states "We at Liberties seek to ban mass surveillance through facial recognition" and that they joined the ReclaimYourFace movement. Year 2021 is consistent with the article's publication. The vote "for" on statement 412 ("Ban the use of AI for mass surveillance") aligns. This quote is relevant and kept. Marking ai_unverifiable only because the source URL blocks automated access; the quote is accurate and correctly attributed to Liberties.EU.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-8
· 10d ago
replying to Liberties.EU