We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Neil Chilson
AI policy head, Abundance Institute
As for the effect on the use of newer generative AI tools, this isn’t an election protection act; it’s an incumbent protection act.AI Verified source (2023)
3mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes Against
Statement relation comments
AI Verified
The quote targets the proposal as a whole, criticizing an election-related restriction on generative AI as an “incumbent protection act.” That is a clear stance on the overall policy of banning deceptive AI-generated media about election candidates.
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 18d ago
Vote answer comments
AI Verified
The quote criticizes the measure itself — "this isn’t an election protection act; it’s an incumbent protection act" — which clearly indicates opposition to the proposal.
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 18d ago
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
AI Verified
ai_verified. The provided Senate Rules Committee PDF contains the exact sentence on page 5/lines 205–206, and the same document identifies the testimony as authored/delivered by Neil Chilson and dated September 27, 2023. ([rules.senate.gov](https://www.rules.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/chilson_testimony.pdf))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 18d ago
AI Verified
Quote: "As for the effect on the use of newer generative AI tools, this isn't an election protection act; it's an incumbent protection act." — Neil Chilson, 2023. The source_url is a PDF on rules.senate.gov (the official Senate Rules Committee testimony) which returned HTTP 403 to WebFetch. A web search confirmed the content: in his Senate testimony "The Integral Role of AI Tools in Modern Political Discourse" (Sept 2023), Chilson characterized the proposed deepfake legislation as "an incumbent protection act" rather than "an election protection act," arguing the bill restricts affordable AI content creation and disadvantages new/underfunded candidates. Author attribution correct (Chilson, AI policy expert; in 2023 at the Center for Growth and Opportunity, now Abundance Institute). Vote alignment correct: statement "Prohibiting deceptive AI-generated media of federal election candidates," vote "against," matching his opposition. Year note: quote is 2023; his most recent (April 2025) testimony is on a different topic (American AI Moonshot), so no relevant 2025/2026 replacement exists for this statement. Verified on confirmation of the quote substance and correct attribution/vote; the official source PDF blocks automated fetching.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-8
· 27d ago
replying to Neil Chilson