We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Republican National Lawyers Association (RNLA)
National bar association for Republicans
The lack of a definition of artificial intelligence (AI) in this legislation is extremely troubling for free speech. S. 2770 would give un-elected, un-appointed career staff in the FEC’s Office of General Counsel initial authority to make recommendations to the Commission on whether AI-generated content is “materially deceptive.” Rules Chair Klobuchar is using the fear of AI to justify restricting speech. [...] The freedom to engage with a diverse array of political speech and determine for ourselves what is true and what is false is sacrosanct. The government is not free to discard this principle so easily to assuage moral panic In addition to the constitutional infirmities detailed above, S. 2770 presents an exceptionally high risk of chilling and censoring protected political expression due to its enforcement mechanism. [...] Senator Klobuchar's latest effort to restrict free speech is the real deception here, not AI.AI Verified source (2023)
3mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes Against
Statement relation comments
AI Verified
The quote directly discusses S. 2770’s ban on 'materially deceptive' AI-generated political content, criticizes its enforcement by the FEC, and clearly opposes the bill as a speech restriction. That matches the policy of prohibiting deceptive AI-generated media in federal elections.
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 19d ago
Vote answer comments
AI Verified
The quote clearly opposes the bill, calling it an effort to "restrict free speech" and saying "Senator Klobuchar's latest effort to restrict free speech is the real deception here, not AI."
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 19d ago
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
AI Verified
Verified: the RNLA page 'Klobuchar AGAIN Tries to Restrict Free Speech,' posted on September 28, 2023 and attributed on-page to 'Republican National Lawyers Association (RNLA),' contains the quoted passages verbatim in sequence. The submitted '[...]' markers faithfully omit intervening text, and the source also shows the unusual run-on from 'moral panic' into 'In addition ...,' matching the submitted wording. ([rnla.org](https://www.rnla.org/klobuchar_again_tries_to_restrict_free_speech))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 19d ago
AI Verified
Quote attributed to the Republican National Lawyers Association (RNLA) opposing the Protect Elections from Deceptive AI Act on free-speech/First Amendment grounds. The rnla.org source returned HTTP 403 to direct fetch, but the page slug ("klobuchar_again_tries_to_restrict_free_speech") matches the article title, and search results corroborate RNLA's characterization of the bill as another Klobuchar effort to "restrict political speech," consistent with the quote ("Senator Klobuchar's latest effort to restrict free speech is the real deception here, not AI"). Vote alignment is correct: the statement is "Prohibiting deceptive AI-generated media of federal election candidates," and RNLA opposes that prohibition, so "against" is accurate. NOTE ON YEAR: this is a 2023 statement opposing the original bill (S.2770), now reintroduced in the 119th Congress as S.1213 (the statement's Mar 2025 reference). I searched extensively for a verbatim 2025/2026 RNLA (or equivalent) replacement quote on S.1213 and could not find one with a verifiable source. I am preserving this quote rather than deleting it because it is genuine, directly on-topic, and provides the only "against" perspective on this statement (the "for" side is freshly covered by the 2025 lead-sponsor Klobuchar quote); deleting it would leave the statement one-sided. The organization's opposing position remains current.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-8
· 28d ago
replying to Republican National Lawyers Association (RNLA)