We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Brian Schatz
U.S. Senator (D–Hawaii)
Embracing the amazing possibilities of AI can’t come at the cost of leaving Americans vulnerable to its profound risks, which is exactly what President Trump’s Executive Order tries to do [...] Discouraging states from enacting common-sense regulation that protects people from potential AI harms is dangerous. Congress has a responsibility to get this technology right, but states must not be penalized for acting in the public interest in the meantime.Verified source (Mar 27, 2026)
3mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation comments
AI Verified
The quote clearly supports allowing states to regulate AI even if federal action is weaker or delayed: it says discouraging state regulation is dangerous and that states 'must not be penalized' for acting. That implies support for states retaining the right to set stronger AI safety protections than the federal government.
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 16d ago
Vote answer comments
AI Verified
The quote clearly supports letting states act: it says "Discouraging states from enacting common-sense regulation... is dangerous" and that "states must not be penalized for acting in the public interest in the meantime."
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 16d ago
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
AI Verified
Official Senate press release at the provided URL, published 03.27.2026, contains the quoted text verbatim across lines 38-39 and explicitly attributes it to Senator Schatz ("said Senator Schatz"). The [...] only replaces the attribution break between sentences, so the stored author, date, source URL, and content are correct. ([schatz.senate.gov](https://www.schatz.senate.gov/news/press-releases/schatz-colleagues-introduce-legislation-to-repeal-trumps-ai-moratorium))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 16d ago
Disputed
Disputed. The cited March 27, 2026 official Schatz press release attributes a similar statement to Brian Schatz, but not this wording: it says Trump’s executive order "tries to do" this, that states were being "discourag[ed]" from regulating AI harms, and that states must "not be penalized"—not the submitted text. An earlier official Schatz release from December 12, 2025 also contains a related quote, but it likewise differs materially (for example, "this executive order does" and "absurd and dangerous," plus an extra closing sentence). ([schatz.senate.gov](https://www.schatz.senate.gov/news/press-releases/schatz-colleagues-introduce-legislation-to-repeal-trumps-ai-moratorium))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 18d ago
replying to Brian Schatz