We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Cesar Fernandez
Head of US State and Local Government Relations at Anthropic
We are opposed to this bill. Good transparency legislation needs to ensure public safety and accountability for the companies developing this powerful technology, not provide a get-out-of-jail-free card against all liability.
AI Verified
source
(2026)
1mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
Verification History
AI Verified
Source_url (gizmodo.com) could not be fetched directly (TLS "certificate is not yet valid" error), but I confirmed the quote verbatim via web search (Fortune, Breitbart, Capitol News Illinois, and others). Cesar Fernandez, Anthropic's head of U.S. state and local government relations, is quoted: "We are opposed to this bill. Good transparency legislation needs to ensure public safety and accountability for the companies developing this powerful technology, not provide a get-out-of-jail-free card against all liability." This referred to Illinois SB 3444, the OpenAI-backed bill that would have shielded frontier AI developers from liability for mass-casualty/large-damage harms. Author attribution (Head of US State and Local Government Relations at Anthropic) is correct. Year 2026 is correct. Vote "for" correctly aligns with statement #395 ("AI companies should be liable for harms caused by their deployed models") — Fernandez/Anthropic opposed a bill granting a liability shield, explicitly favoring accountability and liability for AI companies.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-7
· 2d ago
replying to Cesar Fernandez