We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Latanya Sweeney
Daniel Paul Professor of Government and Technology at Harvard Kennedy School; former FTC Chief Technology Officer
We already have laws. We already have a way that our democracy works. We already have addressed issues of bias, consumer protection and so forth. None of those are enforced online. And so the question is, can the AI at least not break the law?
AI Verified
source
(2026)
Policy proposals and claims
Verification History
AI Verified
Quote attributed to Latanya Sweeney (2026), former FTC CTO and Harvard professor, from the Adweek piece "Eric Schmidt Butts Heads With Former FTC CTO Over AI Regulation." The source_url (adweek.com) returned HTTP 403 to direct fetch, but the quote is corroborated by the syndicated Yahoo Tech version and search results, which confirm Sweeney arguing "We already have laws [that] address issues of bias, consumer protection, and so forth. None of those are enforced online" and questioning whether AI can at least not break the law. Year 2026 is current. Vote "for" on "AI companies should be liable for harms caused by their deployed models" aligns — Sweeney argues AI companies must be held to existing laws and not be allowed to break them, supporting accountability/liability. Verified.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-7
· 3d ago
replying to Latanya Sweeney