We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Reid Hoffman
LinkedIn co-founder, venture capitalist, author of Superagency
We have a very natural instinct to say: we want as much interpretability as possible. One of the sci-fi worry cases is that agents start speaking in languages to each other that we don't understand. [...] I bet there are ways to define boundaries that are safe.Disputed source (2026)
20d ago
Policy proposals and claims
abstains
Statement relation verification history
Unverified
No statement relation verification comments yet.
Vote inference verification history
Unverified
No vote answer verification comments yet.
Quote authenticity verification history
Verification History
Disputed
Disputed. The source URL is a real Every transcript dated 2026-01-05, but the stored quote is not a verbatim single-author Reid Hoffman quote: the interpretability passage is spoken by Reid Hoffman, while the sentence 'But I bet there are ways to define boundaries that are safe.' is spoken by Dan Shipper. Because it combines multiple speakers, this platform cannot verify it as a single-author quote.
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 2d ago
Disputed
Disputed. The cited Every transcript does contain the interpretability passage under Reid Hoffman, including the line about agents speaking in languages humans do not understand. But the closing sentence in your quote — “I bet there are ways to define boundaries that are safe” — appears later in the transcript under Dan Shipper, not Hoffman. So the supplied quote is a stitched, non-verbatim composite and is misattributed. ([every.to](https://every.to/podcast/transcript-reid-hoffman-makes-five-predictions-about-ai-in-2026))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 5d ago
AI Unverifiable
Source URL on every.to returns HTTP 403 to WebFetch. Web search confirms Reid Hoffman discusses the "sci-fi worry case" of agents speaking languages we don't understand in the context of the Every podcast "Reid Hoffman Makes Five Predictions About AI In 2026." Vote "abstain" on requiring interpretability above a capability threshold is consistent with Hoffman's nuanced framing: he acknowledges the natural instinct to want maximal interpretability and the worry case, but qualifies with "I bet there are ways to define boundaries that are safe" — suggesting he doesn't fully commit to mandatory interpretability requirements. Marking ai_unverifiable since the primary source itself can't be retrieved to confirm exact wording.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-7
· 20d ago
replying to Reid Hoffman