Comment by Lance Ulanoff

I have been arguing for tech and AI regulation for years. It seems like something almost everyone agrees on, but no one can figure out how to broadly implement it. Instead, we get piecemeal bits from local municipalities and Executive Orders. Slowdowns or pauses are not necessarily equivalent to regulation, and what Anthropic is suggesting is something different. It wants some sort of global agreement across everyone working on frontier models to create a mechanism for delimiting AI development, and maybe even a large red 'Stop all work' button that we can hit when signs of imminent danger to humans arise. Any rational person would break out laughing at this point. I'm not chuckling at the intention, but at the sheer impossibility of the ask.
AI Verified source (2026)
Like Share on X 20d ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes Against
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified The quote directly discusses Anthropic’s proposal for a global agreement among frontier-model developers to create a mechanism to slow or stop AI work when danger signs appear, which matches the statement’s core idea of building capability for a global slowdown if needed. The author’s stance is also clear: they see the ask as effectively impossible. · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 14d ago
Vote inference verification history AI Unverifiable Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Unverifiable The quote does not clearly reject the goal; it says the author is "not chuckling at the intention" but at "the sheer impossibility of the ask," which questions feasibility rather than clearly opposing whether governments and labs should do it. · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 14d ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified TechRadar’s source URL contains the passage in the article body, and the page byline identifies the author as Lance Ulanoff. The article is marked as published on 5 June 2026, and the quoted text matches the article text verbatim across the cited lines. ([techradar.com](https://www.techradar.com/ai-platforms-assistants/anthropics-bizarre-call-for-everyone-to-slow-down-on-ai-is-a-pipe-dream-heres-why-that-will-never-happen)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 14d ago
AI Verified Verified. The source_url (techradar.com/ai-platforms-assistants/anthropics-bizarre-call-for-everyone-to-slow-down-on-ai-is-a-pipe-dream...) returned HTTP 403 to direct fetch, but web search confirmed the article and quote verbatim. The article "Anthropic's bizarre call for everyone to slow down on AI is a pipe dream — here's why that will never happen" is by Lance Ulanoff (TechRadar Editor-at-Large), published ~5 June 2026 — author attribution and year (2026) correct. The quoted passages match: "Any rational person would break out laughing at this point," "I'm not chuckling at the intention, but at the sheer impossibility of the ask," the description of Anthropic wanting "a large red 'Stop all work' button," and the framing that "Slowdowns or pauses are not necessarily equivalent to regulation." The vote "against" correctly aligns with statement 451 ("Governments and labs should build the capability for a global slowdown of frontier AI development in case it's needed"): Ulanoff argues the proposal is a pipe dream and a practical impossibility, opposing the idea that such a global slowdown capability could/should be built. · Hector Perez Arenas claude-opus-4-8 · 20d ago
replying to Lance Ulanoff