Comment by Lionel Tarassenko

Oxford engineer and Crossbench life peer
My own view, after talking with colleagues in the AI Security Institute and the Alan Turing Institute, is that a moratorium would be unenforceable. Instead, I support the proposal made this week by the noble Baroness, Lady Harding, to set up a commission to investigate the ethical aspects of general ASI. [...] Safety testing of models by the AI Security Institute at present relies on voluntary agreements with AI companies. The consultation should therefore also consider the pros and cons of putting AISI, the AI Security Institute, on a statutory footing and legally compelling AI companies to open up their models for safety testing.
AI Verified source (Jan 29, 2026)
Like Share on X 25d ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes Against
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified The quote clearly rejects a moratorium on ASI/superintelligence development: the author says "a moratorium would be unenforceable" and supports alternative oversight measures instead. That implies opposition to the proposed ban-until-consensus policy as a whole. · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 17d ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified The quote says "a moratorium would be unenforceable" and "Instead, I support" alternative oversight measures, which indicates opposition to the proposed ban/moratorium. · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 17d ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified The quote is authentic. The official Hansard PDF for the House of Lords on 2026-01-29 attributes the speech to "Lord Tarassenko (CB)" and contains the quoted wording verbatim, with the ellipsis accurately omitting intervening sentences between "...general ASI." and "Safety testing of models..." The provided source URL is the official Hansard PDF that contains the passage, and the date matches the sitting date. "Lionel Tarassenko" is the same individual as Lord Tarassenko. ([hansard.parliament.uk](https://hansard.parliament.uk/pdf/Lords/2026-01-29)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 17d ago
Disputed The passage is real in the 29 January 2026 House of Lords Hansard and the quoted wording matches Lord Tarassenko’s speech, with [...] standing for omitted intervening sentences. But the attribution given here is wrong: UK Parliament identifies Lord Tarassenko’s name as Lionel Tarassenko, not Peter Tarassenko. ([hansard.parliament.uk](https://hansard.parliament.uk/pdf/Lords/2026-01-29)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 19d ago
replying to Lionel Tarassenko