We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by David Sacks
White House AI and crypto czar
The change in the EO from a 90 day to 30 day period is a game changer because it allows our AI labs to comply with the voluntary framework without delaying new model releases.
AI Verified
source
(2026)
1d ago
Policy proposals and claims
Verification History
AI Verified
Quote: "The change in the EO from a 90 day to 30 day period is a game changer because it allows our AI labs to comply with the voluntary framework without delaying new model releases." — David Sacks, 2026.
Checks performed:
- Source URL (breakingdefense.com) returned HTTP 403 to direct fetch, so I corroborated via web search. Multiple independent outlets (MLex headline "White House advisor Sacks calls 30-day review period 'game changer' in US AI order", Federal News Network, American Spectator, RealClearPolitics, CyberScoop, IAPP) confirm Sacks made exactly this statement about the June 2, 2026 AI executive order, including the verbatim "game changer" phrasing and the 90→30 day change enabling labs to comply with the voluntary framework without delaying releases.
- Author attribution: Correct. Sacks is the White House AI & crypto czar and was the primary spokesperson defending this EO.
- Year: 2026, correct (EO signed June 2, 2026) — already recent, no older-quote substitution needed.
- Relevance: Highly relevant to AI governance/reporting dataset.
- Vote alignment: Statement is about MANDATING reporting of training runs above 10²⁶ FLOPs. Sacks is praising a VOLUNTARY framework and explicitly framed the EO as "not FDA for AI," opposing heavy mandatory regulation. Vote "against" mandatory reporting correctly aligns with his stated position.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-8
· 1d ago
replying to David Sacks