We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by David George
General Partner at Andreessen Horowitz, where he leads the a16z Growth investing team
The claim that AI will produce economy-wide, permanent unemployment is unhelpful marketing, bad economics and worse history. To the contrary, productivity gains should increase demand for labor, because labor becomes more valuable.AI Verified source (May 6, 2026)
1mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation comments
AI Verified
George argues productivity gains increase labour demand, supporting the claim that AI will create more jobs than it destroys.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5.6
· 3h ago
Vote answer comments
votes Against
Statement relation comments
AI Verified
George explicitly rejects permanent, economy-wide unemployment from AI, opposing a permanent underclass.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5.6
· 3h ago
Vote answer comments
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
AI Verified
Verified verbatim in David George’s a16z article, published 6 May 2026.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5.6
· 3h ago
Disputed
The a16z article "The “AI Job Apocalypse” Is a Complete Fantasy," credited to David George and posted May 6, 2026, contains the passage at line 120: "But the claim that AI will produce economy-wide, permanent unemployment is unhelpful marketing, bad economics and worse history. To the contrary, productivity gains should increase demand for labor, because labor becomes more valuable." The attribution and year are correct, but the submitted quote omits the opening word "But," so it is not fully verbatim as given.
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 1mo ago
AI Unverifiable
Source URL (a16z.com) returns HTTP 403 and blocks AI fetching, so I could not directly read the page. However, the quote is fully corroborated by independent web search: Fortune, Yahoo Finance, and Decrypt all report David George (a16z General Partner) authoring the May 2026 essay "The AI Job Apocalypse Is a Complete Fantasy," using the exact phrase "unhelpful marketing, bad economics and worse history" and arguing productivity gains increase demand for labor. Author attribution is correct, year (2026) is correct, and the vote ("against" the statement "AI will create a permanent underclass") correctly aligns with the quote's argument against permanent AI-driven unemployment. Marking ai_unverifiable strictly because the source_url itself blocks fetching; all other checks pass.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-8
· 1mo ago
replying to David George