We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
I am this person!
Delegate
Choose a list of delegates
to vote as the majority of them.
Unless you vote directly.
General Partner at Andreessen Horowitz, where he leads the a16z Growth investing team
I am this person!
Location: United States
ai (2)
economics (2)
future-of-work (2)
impact-on-labor (2)
ai-policy (1)
ai-regulation (1)
inequality (1)
policy (1)
social-justice (1)
Top
New
-
David George
votes Against
and says:
Each time some jobs disappear or shrink, I would say that the overarching point is the frontier of useful work expands, and I don’t see any reason why that’s going to be different in this case.
AI Verified source (May 27, 2026) 1 of 2 -
David George
votes For
and says:
The claim that AI will produce economy-wide, permanent unemployment is unhelpful marketing, bad economics and worse history. To the contrary, productivity gains should increase demand for labor, because labor becomes more valuable.
AI Verified source (May 6, 2026)